Flerfs treating TFE as a threat: Difference between revisions
PeterMarkley (talk | contribs) Adjust article structure |
PeterMarkley (talk | contribs) Add quote |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Flerfs have repeatedly claimed, or expressed anxieties, that TFE is a “hit-piece.” In response to this, [[User:MCToon|MCToon]] has said: | Flerfs have repeatedly claimed, or expressed anxieties, that TFE is a “hit-piece.” In response to this, [[User:MCToon|MCToon]] has said: | ||
<blockquote>I didn’t have to stick the camera in [[[Austin Witsit|Witsit]]’s] face, I didn’t have to do anything to mock … None of that is necessary. That’s not the type of “hit-piece” that this is. This is a hit-piece. One hundred percent, it’s a hit-piece. The hit-piece is that the sun circled for 24 hours a day. That’s the hit-piece.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/live/2eAqrEpDZ5k?t=37m54s</ref></blockquote> | <blockquote>I mean, how can you have a “hit-piece,” right? The fact that the sun doesn’t set [near the [[Wikipedia:Geographical pole|Pole]], around the [[Wikipedia:Solstice|Solstice]]] … That’s the “hit-piece.”<ref>https://www.youtube.com/live/O_CJzkN-ENE?t=35m37s</ref></blockquote> | ||
<blockquote>I didn’t have to stick the camera in [[[Austin Witsit|Witsit]]’s] face, I didn’t have to do anything to mock … None of that is necessary. That’s not the type of “hit-piece” that this is. This ''is'' a hit-piece. One hundred percent, it’s a hit-piece. The hit-piece is that the sun circled for 24 hours a day. That’s the hit-piece.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/live/2eAqrEpDZ5k?t=37m54s</ref></blockquote> | |||
In other words, to a science denier (like a flerf) '''''reality itself'' is a “hit-piece,”''' and therefore so is anything that forces them to confront reality—such as TFE. | In other words, to a science denier (like a flerf) '''''reality itself'' is a “hit-piece,”''' and therefore so is anything that forces them to confront reality—such as TFE. | ||
Revision as of 23:53, 16 December 2025
This page documents examples of flerfs treating The Final Experiment as a threat and attempting to discredit it as a hoax. In doing this, they unwittingly admit that the physical evidence collected on the trip, especially the southern 24-hour sun, is a threat to their worldview.
Flerfs have repeatedly claimed, or expressed anxieties, that TFE is a “hit-piece.” In response to this, MCToon has said:
I mean, how can you have a “hit-piece,” right? The fact that the sun doesn’t set [near the Pole, around the Solstice] … That’s the “hit-piece.”[1]
I didn’t have to stick the camera in [Witsit’s] face, I didn’t have to do anything to mock … None of that is necessary. That’s not the type of “hit-piece” that this is. This is a hit-piece. One hundred percent, it’s a hit-piece. The hit-piece is that the sun circled for 24 hours a day. That’s the hit-piece.[2]
In other words, to a science denier (like a flerf) reality itself is a “hit-piece,” and therefore so is anything that forces them to confront reality—such as TFE.
Examples
(in progress)