Artemis II
Artemis II (As of April 6, 2026)
What this page is for
This page is a plain-language evidence brief for two groups:
- People debating common spaceflight denial claims.
- Skeptics (including flat-Earth audiences) who are open to checking primary sources directly.
The goal is not rhetoric. The goal is to test claims against dated, verifiable records.
Quick facts
- NASA reports Artemis II launched on April 1, 2026, at 6:35 p.m. EDT from Launch Complex 39B, Kennedy Space Center.[1]
- Crew: Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch, and CSA astronaut Jeremy Hansen.[2]
- Mission profile: roughly 10-day crewed lunar flyby and return using a free-return trajectory.[2]
- NASA published dated mission-event coverage for launch, translunar operations, and lunar flyby windows.[3]
"Hello, World" paired images (about 19 seconds apart)
NASA released two Earth photos taken seconds apart with different camera settings (one emphasizes the night side, the other is the widely shared "Hello, World" view). The mission article and gallery pages below are the primary web entry points.
NASA web pages
- Hello, World (image article)
- Hello, World (large presentation image page)
- art002e000193 (backlit Earth, first in time)
- Earth From the Perspective of Artemis II (art002e000192, the "Hello, World" release asset)
- Journey to the Moon gallery (lists both assets among mission imagery)
Source files and EXIF metadata (originals + JSON)
| Asset ID | NASA Images catalog | Original JPG | Machine-readable metadata |
|---|---|---|---|
| art002e000193 | images.nasa.gov | orig | metadata.json |
| art002e000192 | images.nasa.gov | orig | metadata.json |
Capture times in UTC (from EXIF, with subseconds)
These times come from EXIF:DateTimeOriginal plus subsecond fields in NASA's metadata.json / ExifTool output on the ~orig.jpg files.
- art002e000193 (first exposure): 2026-04-03 00:27:20.82 UTC
- art002e000192 ("Hello, World" / Earth From the Perspective): 2026-04-03 00:27:39.26 UTC
- Elapsed time between captures: 18.44 seconds (same pair NASA describes as seconds apart with different settings)
Time zone note (camera vs file processing)
Classic EXIF stores DateTimeOriginal without a time-zone suffix. These files also include EXIF:OffsetTime of -05:00 on some tags, while EXIF:OffsetTimeOriginal is absent. That pattern commonly reflects ground processing workstation timestamps, not a reliable claim that the camera shutter clock was set to UTC−5.
For public mission timing, NASA's release context for this milestone aligns with reporting the capture instant in UTC as listed above (also consistent with subsecond ordering of the pair).
Why this mission matters for evidence discussions
1) It is not a single-organization story
Artemis II includes international participation (CSA crew member) and partner hardware programs documented in mission material.[2]
2) It has public, time-stamped operations
NASA published expected mission windows, event timings, and regular updates, including phases where communications are expected to drop behind the Moon and then return.[3]
3) It uses a testable trajectory model
The mission design is a free-return path in the Earth-Moon gravity system, which is an established, checkable orbital approach rather than an arbitrary claim.[2]
Mission timeline (primary-source snapshot)
April 1, 2026 (Launch Day)


- Liftoff reported at 6:35 p.m. EDT.[1]
- Core-stage cutoff/separation and Orion solar array deployment reported in mission updates.[1]
April 2, 2026
- NASA reported perigee-raise burn completion and translunar injection preparation.[4]
April 6, 2026 (lunar flyby day in NASA schedule)
- NASA published flyby coverage windows, including lunar sphere-of-influence milestones and expected far-side communications loss/reacquisition periods.[3]
Imagery with source provenance
-
Launch image with source page: NASA.
-
Crew walkout image with source page: NASA.
-
Orion in-flight selfie with source page: NASA.
-
Crescent Earth image with source page: NASA.
How to handle common claims
Claim: "Only NASA says this happened."
Use multiple layers: launch timeline, international crew participation, partner systems, public mission windows, and in-flight imagery with source pages.[1][2][3]
Claim: "Moon missions are impossible because of fuel."
Artemis II is a flyby test mission, not a landing mission. Its profile uses staged propulsion and free-return geometry to reduce risk and energy requirements.[2]
Claim: "Behind-the-Moon comms behavior is fake."
Expected communication loss on far-side passage is a line-of-sight radio geometry consequence and was listed in mission coverage plans beforehand.[3]
For skeptics who want to learn
A practical method is:
- Start with mission pages, not social clips.
- Write down time claims before checking evidence.
- Check whether independent facts (crew, timeline, trajectory, comms behavior, imagery provenance) fit together.
- If you reject one model, propose an alternative that explains all observed constraints at once.
Limits
This page is a dated snapshot. Mission operations can shift in real time. Always check current official updates for final timings and outcomes.[3]
Sources
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 https://www.nasa.gov/blogs/missions/2026/04/01/live-artemis-ii-launch-day-updates/
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 https://www.nasa.gov/artemis-ii-press-kit/
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 https://www.nasa.gov/missions/artemis/artemis-2/nasa-sets-coverage-for-artemis-ii-moon-mission/
- ↑ https://www.nasa.gov/blogs/missions/2026/04/02/artemis-ii-flight-update-perigee-raise-burn-complete/