Laws of Flerf: Difference between revisions
Created page with "= Toon’s Laws of Flerf = # Flerf citations always contradict the flerf’s claim. No exceptions. # Flerf challenges are fake. No exceptions. # Flerfs are pseudoscientists when evaluating FE and science deniers when evaluating globe evidence. No exceptions. # Every attempt to flerf-explain a phenomenon contradicts flerf-explanations of some other phenomena. No exceptions." |
PeterMarkley (talk | contribs) Add "see also" |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
# Flerfs are pseudoscientists when evaluating FE and science deniers when evaluating globe evidence. No exceptions. | # Flerfs are pseudoscientists when evaluating FE and science deniers when evaluating globe evidence. No exceptions. | ||
# Every attempt to flerf-explain a phenomenon contradicts flerf-explanations of some other phenomena. No exceptions. | # Every attempt to flerf-explain a phenomenon contradicts flerf-explanations of some other phenomena. No exceptions. | ||
= See Also = | |||
* [[:Category:Bad faith incidents]] | |||
Revision as of 02:56, 10 February 2025
Toon’s Laws of Flerf
- Flerf citations always contradict the flerf’s claim. No exceptions.
- Flerf challenges are fake. No exceptions.
- Flerfs are pseudoscientists when evaluating FE and science deniers when evaluating globe evidence. No exceptions.
- Every attempt to flerf-explain a phenomenon contradicts flerf-explanations of some other phenomena. No exceptions.