Scientific Method: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 12:23, 5 June 2026

This flawed method created by a flerf nammed theviking:

Scientific Method:

Observe Natural Phenomenon (occurring naturally in nature) see something in nature without man creating or causing it.
Background research & ask questions (see if anyone else has done the same experiment & explore possible reasons for the phenomena to occur) why, how, such happens.
Develop Hypothesis (If cause A "IV", then effect B "DV") Alt Hypothesis (if A, then B) & the contrapositive Null Hypothesis (if A, then not B).
Experiment (Vary & manipulate the presumed cause "IV", to vary & induce the effect "DV") Keeping everything else constant/controlled "CV". Systematic experimentation validates your Hypothesis (proving the alt or the null)
Conclusion/Publish (which Hypothesis was proven "alt or null") either of them would be proof about the observed natural phenomena in step 1, and would be part of step 2 for the next researcher.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Scientific Method:
-) Observe Natural Phenomenon (occurring naturally in nature) see something in nature without man creating or causing it.
+# Observe Natural Phenomenon (occurring naturally in nature) see something in nature without man creating or causing it.
-) Background research & ask questions (see if anyone else has done the same experiment & explore possible reasons for the phenomena to occur) why, how, such happens.
+# Background research & ask questions (see if anyone else has done the same experiment & explore possible reasons for the phenomena to occur) why, how, such happens.
-) Develop Hypothesis (If cause A "IV", then effect B "DV") Alt Hypothesis (if A, then B) & the contrapositive Null Hypothesis (if A, then not B).
+# Develop Hypothesis (If cause A "IV", then effect B "DV") Alt Hypothesis (if A, then B) & the contrapositive Null Hypothesis (if A, then not B).
-) Experiment (Vary & manipulate the presumed cause "IV", to vary & induce the effect "DV") Keeping everything else constant/controlled "CV". Systematic experimentation validates your Hypothesis (proving the alt or the null)
+# Experiment (Vary & manipulate the presumed cause "IV", to vary & induce the effect "DV") Keeping everything else constant/controlled "CV". Systematic experimentation validates your Hypothesis (proving the alt or the null)
-) Conclusion/Publish (which Hypothesis was proven "alt or null") either of them would be proof about the observed natural phenomena in step 1, and would be part of step 2 for the next researcher.
+# Conclusion/Publish (which Hypothesis was proven "alt or null") either of them would be proof about the observed natural phenomena in step 1, and would be part of step 2 for the next researcher.
+[[Category:Flerf lies]]