Jump to content

Restricted List: Difference between revisions

From Flerf Wiki
Washcarso (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Washcarso (talk | contribs)
"Gravity-free" calculator: new section (currently invisible)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
|image=File:Restricted list profile Sep 2026.jpg
|image=File:Restricted list profile Sep 2026.jpg
|caption=restricted_list's profile on Threads as of September 2026
|caption=restricted_list's profile on Threads as of September 2026
|main=Threads
|platform=[https://www.threads.com/@restricted_list Threads]
}}
}}


'''restricted_list''' is a United States-based flerf who posts on {{wp|Threads (social network)|Threads}}. He regularly argues with [[globers]] on the platform, and seems to rely excessively on {{wp|chatbot|AI}} to refute their arguments, and a result, much of his language often sounds AI-generated. He also heavily posts out-of-context memes as "evidence", then refuses to provide sources.
'''restricted_list''' is a United States-based flerf who posts on {{wp|Threads (social network)|Threads}}. He regularly argues with [[globers]] on the platform, and seems to rely excessively on {{wp|chatbot|AI}} to refute their arguments, and a result, much of his language often sounds AI-generated. He also frequently posts out-of-context memes as "evidence", then refuses to provide sources.


He has pushed truly some of the dumbest flat-earth arguments on the planet. He maintains that gravity is unfalsifiable because "you can't remove mass from gravity" and "you can't shield gravity". He thinks being able to see faces in photos of Earth means they're fake, because NASA is intentionally hiding faces for people to find.
He has pushed truly some of the dumbest flat-earth arguments on the planet. He maintains that gravity is unfalsifiable because "you can't remove gravity from mass" and "you can't shield gravity". He thinks being able to see faces in photos of Earth means they're fake (because NASA is intentionally hiding faces for people to find).


He consistently demonstrates all three [[laws of flerfs]] to an exceptional standard.
He consistently demonstrates all three [[laws of flerf]] to an exceptional standard.


=="Gravity-free" calculator==
=="Gravity-free" calculator==
Line 15: Line 15:
Recently, restricted_list has claimed to have developed a fully functioning calculator for predicting rates of fall without using gravity.  
Recently, restricted_list has claimed to have developed a fully functioning calculator for predicting rates of fall without using gravity.  


Of course, his "gravity-free" calculator uses gravity; "g" has just been substituted out for the atmosphere's pressure gradient, which is calculated using g because it relies on gravity existing. Whatever AI he asked to make the calculator likely interpreted his prompt as "a calculator that does not directly use g or {{wp|gravitational constant|G}}".
Of course, his "gravity-free" calculator uses gravity; "{{wp|Gravity of Earth|g}}" has just been substituted out for the atmosphere's pressure gradient, which is calculated using g because it relies on gravity existing. Whatever AI he asked to make the calculator likely interpreted his prompt as "a calculator that does not directly use g or {{wp|gravitational constant|G}}".


[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IIem4z-BvLhE7NMXeIlthiQ6M-_77etLBG0u6j_V-Mo/edit?gid=1261802340#gid=1261802340 Link to the calculator on Google Sheets]
[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IIem4z-BvLhE7NMXeIlthiQ6M-_77etLBG0u6j_V-Mo/edit?gid=1261802340#gid=1261802340 Link to the calculator on Google Sheets]
<!--(invisible until finished)
===Equations used in the "calculator"===
The calculator calculates two acceleration values; one due to "density/pressure" and one due to "electrostatics". The two accelerations are then added together to get the net acceleration.
===="Density/pressure acceleration"====
This equation is actually all that is needed to fully account for 9.8 m/s<sup>2</sup>, but this is because its mathematically identical to gravity plus buoyancy.
===="Electrostatic acceleration"====
This relies on object polarisability and a non-uniform electric field. The Earth's atmosphere does indeed have a non-uniform electric field (starting at around 100 V/m then decreasing with height), but &nabla; E is nowhere near great enough to noticeably accelerate a macroscopic object.
-->


==Use of AI==
==Use of AI==

Latest revision as of 22:22, 21 September 2026

Restricted List
restricted_list's profile on Threads as of September 2026
Real name unknown
Main platform Threads
Papa flerf unknown
Flerfzi? not yet confirmed
Religiflerf? unknown
Incel? not yet confirmed
Drinks urine? not yet confirmed
Adopted by not adopted yet
Teeth slightly less than full set
VTE

restricted_list is a United States-based flerf who posts on Threads. He regularly argues with globers on the platform, and seems to rely excessively on AI to refute their arguments, and a result, much of his language often sounds AI-generated. He also frequently posts out-of-context memes as "evidence", then refuses to provide sources.

He has pushed truly some of the dumbest flat-earth arguments on the planet. He maintains that gravity is unfalsifiable because "you can't remove gravity from mass" and "you can't shield gravity". He thinks being able to see faces in photos of Earth means they're fake (because NASA is intentionally hiding faces for people to find).

He consistently demonstrates all three laws of flerf to an exceptional standard.

"Gravity-free" calculator

Recently, restricted_list has claimed to have developed a fully functioning calculator for predicting rates of fall without using gravity.

Of course, his "gravity-free" calculator uses gravity; "g" has just been substituted out for the atmosphere's pressure gradient, which is calculated using g because it relies on gravity existing. Whatever AI he asked to make the calculator likely interpreted his prompt as "a calculator that does not directly use g or G".

Link to the calculator on Google Sheets


Use of AI

He has convinced chatbots like Gemini to agree with him on his flat Earth talking points. Because real research involves listening to AI's opinions, especially when AI's opinions are designed to be aligned with your own.

Screenshot of Gemini restricted_list posted to support the idea that the heliocentric model is "unflasifiable".

Other info