Restricted

The GRAVITY FREE CALCS HAVE BEEN UPDATED The calculator no longer derives its pressure gradient from previous or any g type of hydrostatic equation. Pressure is taken from raw measurements, medium density is independently recalculated from local pressure and temperature, object density is measured and neither G nor g appears in the calculation engine. .. so you are no longer focused on being accurate . It’s obsession over a person for a disagreement. Sick behavior .. you realizing you are proving your model isn’t science right ??? Are you okay Oscar . Do you want a page about you .. cause that’s the next move .. please keep it up

Hi, I'm a glober & I have dogma, and it's bad. So bad I stalk pages of people I don't even know and made a page because I obviously need to PROTECT MY MODEL. Why does it need this much protection if it was genuinely falsifiable? Because it's not. I take it right to the heart, and I'll gladly do it again because I have dogma. Science is encouraged to be challenged, but not this model, because by repeatedly updating a profile I don't know about the person, it's proving it's pseudoscience every time I loop back around and post misinformation about someone I've never met. You see how sick that is. I write about people I don't even know their first name because I'm a glober & my model is unfalsifiable, meaning I'm so blinded I think there's no possible way the photos can be faked. Even though “it’s photoshop but it has to be” I don't care about that. Space is the place I've never been to, but I imagine it so hard it's like I've been there. I depend on strawman arguments & being a victim because my dogma says so.

And yes, I'll do it again. Again & again until my unfalsifiable model remains unfalsifiable.

It's literally dogma. If my model were actual science, it could be genuinely challenged & encouraged to be, but of course it can't be challenged. I HAVE TO protect it like a guard dog, because it's dogma. That's what dogma does: it ignores logic and lets raw emotion run the entire framework because it's a fragile pseudoscience.

I promise you, I'll do it again. I'll watch him & race back over here to change everything back just like I always do, proving the entire point. I have to protect the model.

UPDATE…..The calculation architecture has been completely UPDATED and decoupled from hydrostatics, buoyancy, and density metrics. The model no longer relies on those calculations at all, yet it CONTINUES to output the exact same baseline acceleration results. THE CALCULATOR IS MORE USER FRIENDLY & stronger than ever now. As a glober I will have to pretend that's not the case because that's my only line of defense. I'll say something like he hasn't shown it yet. That's because I can't find his page to ask.

This completely shatters this page's recycled critiques. They claim electrostatics is 'not strong enough,' even though it is a trillion times stronger than gravity. That's an admission that makes their fiat force a smart dust by their own metrics. Gravity remains entirely unisolated and unshieldable, whereas electrostatic forces can be directly manipulated and tested in real world environments.

Because gravity cannot be independently isolated, only ASSUMED, it operates as an unfalsifiable placeholder, chalkboard math, & the name isn't even restricted. That's how slow they are, still clinging on to the past.

WHAT'S NEXT LOL? Is more cope & repeated strawman because I've been triggered to the point that a wiki page is my new safe haven lmao.

Calculations 100% don't need gravity & it's more automated & user friendly than before. I can't latch on to the calculations, but I will because I have nothing left to cope with.

I have to strawman to make my point. Because I can't use actual points. I rely on strawman arguments btw.