Talk:Restricted

Dear Vandal,

learn how to work in a wiki environment. Replacing full pages just will get your sock blocked and the page rolled back. If you have an issue with certain things: Behave like a normal person and ADD it here.

Vandalism

This page has been repeatedly vandalised by the flerf whom this page is about. He really doesn't like the fact that his AI-generated "gravity-free calculator" has been exposed for using gravity. He has created several user accounts to evade blocks, and has repeatedly blanked and replaced the contents of several pages on this wiki, including

• The wiki page, Restricted
• This talk page
• My user page, User:Washcarso
• My user talk page, User talk:Washcarso

In his vandalish edits, he claimed to have updated his calculator to definitely not use gravity this time.

As anyone can see from this revision, I offered to have a good faith discussion on this talk page if he stoped page blanking and gave the link to his new calculator.

Restricted refused that opportunity and continued page blanking in his second round of vandalism. Now his unhinged rants are here for all to see. This is some of the best content on Flerf Wiki and he gave it to us for free! Washcarso (talk) 00:30, 29 September 2026 (EDT)

Round 1 (27 September)

These edits were mostly done by User:Flawrock (contribs):

From the wiki page:

The GRAVITY FREE CALCS HAVE BEEN UPDATED The calculator no longer derives its pressure gradient from previous or any g type of hydrostatic equation. Pressure is taken from raw measurements, medium density is independently recalculated from local pressure and temperature, object density is measured and neither G nor g appears in the calculation engine. .. so you are no longer focused on being accurate . It’s obsession over a person for a disagreement. Sick behavior .. you realizing you are proving your model isn’t science right ??? Are you okay Oscar . Do you want a page about you .. cause that’s the next move .. please keep it up

Hi, I'm a glober & I have dogma, and it's bad. So bad I stalk pages of people I don't even know and made a page because I obviously need to PROTECT MY MODEL. Why does it need this much protection if it was genuinely falsifiable? Because it's not. I take it right to the heart, and I'll gladly do it again because I have dogma. Science is encouraged to be challenged, but not this model, because by repeatedly updating a profile I don't know about the person, it's proving it's pseudoscience every time I loop back around and post misinformation about someone I've never met. You see how sick that is. I write about people I don't even know their first name because I'm a glober & my model is unfalsifiable, meaning I'm so blinded I think there's no possible way the photos can be faked. Even though “it’s photoshop but it has to be” I don't care about that. Space is the place I've never been to, but I imagine it so hard it's like I've been there. I depend on strawman arguments & being a victim because my dogma says so.

And yes, I'll do it again. Again & again until my unfalsifiable model remains unfalsifiable.

It's literally dogma. If my model were actual science, it could be genuinely challenged & encouraged to be, but of course it can't be challenged. I HAVE TO protect it like a guard dog, because it's dogma. That's what dogma does: it ignores logic and lets raw emotion run the entire framework because it's a fragile pseudoscience.

I promise you, I'll do it again. I'll watch him & race back over here to change everything back just like I always do, proving the entire point. I have to protect the model.

UPDATE…..The calculation architecture has been completely UPDATED and decoupled from hydrostatics, buoyancy, and density metrics. The model no longer relies on those calculations at all, yet it CONTINUES to output the exact same baseline acceleration results. THE CALCULATOR IS MORE USER FRIENDLY & stronger than ever now. As a glober I will have to pretend that's not the cxase because that's my only line of defense. I'll say something like he hasn't shown it yet. That's because I can't find his page to ask.

This completely shatters this page's recycled critiques. They claim electrostatics is 'not strong enough,' even though it is a trillion times stronger than gravity. That's an admission that makes their fiat force a smart dust by their own metrics. Gravity remains entirely unisolated and unshieldable, whereas electrostatic forces can be directly manipulated and tested in real world environments.

Because gravity cannot be independently isolated, only ASSUMED, it operates as an unfalsifiable placeholder, chalkboard math, & the name isn't even restricted. That's how slow they are, still clinging on to the past.

WHAT'S NEXT LOL? Is more cope & repeated strawman because I've been triggered to the point that a wiki page is my new safe haven lmao.

Calculations 100% don't need gravity & it's more automated & user friendly than before. I can't latch on to the calculations, but I will because I have nothing left to cope with.

I have to strawman to make my point. Because I can't use actual points. I rely on strawman arguments btw.

From this talk page:

UPDATE…..The calculation architecture has been completely UPDATED and decoupled from hydrostatics, buoyancy, and density metrics. The model no longer relies on those calculations at all, yet it CONTINUES to output the exact same baseline acceleration results. THE CALCULATOR IS MORE USER FRIENDLY & stronger than ever now. As a glober I will have to pretend that's not the case because that's my only line of defense. I'll say something like he hasn't shown it yet. That's because I can't find his page to ask.

From my user page:

My name is Oscar , & I dont Care about anything factual anymore. The gravity free calculator does not rely on buoyancy & density anymore but I dont Care because Im not here for the truth

It’s not that gravity can’t be shielded or isolated from gravity. It’s that gravity can’t be isolated AT ALL!!!! Get that through your thick skull. GRAVITY HAS ONLY BEEN ASSUMED. It’s never been unequivocally isolated in a lab. ELECTROSTATIC HAS BEEN. Deleted everything & assuming what’s left is not ISOLATION. What happens when I create a new force on top of gravity & don’t have to have it isolated to prove itself? YOU’LL SAY IT’S FAKE. But that’s exactly the special pleading gravity has. ALL THE EXPERIMENTS ASSUME GRAVITY. Never proved. YOU CAN’T GRASP THAT CONCEPT because you don’t understand physics. SIMPLE AS THAT. It’s never been isolated effectively. Stop strawmanning because you can’t take accountability. It’s never been UNDOUBTEDLY ISOLATED. Electrostatic has. YOU STILL DON’T UNDERSTAND ISOLATION. Instead you should REALLY STUDY it. Shielding is one FORM of isolation. All a force needs is ONE FORM. GRAVITY HAS NO FORMS OF ISOLATION. ZERO. You cope with saying gravity is attached to mass. It shouldn’t have to be if it’s a real force. It’s a fiat force, meaning it’s backed by FAITH. That’s your inability to take accountability. So you project your insecurity & call me things because you can’t isolate gravity or manipulate it in a lab. All your model has is EXCUSES WHY SOMETHING CAN’T HAPPEN. More excuses. You wrote a whole page about me because you’re insecure. How about you go build something on your threads page with your 4 followers instead of basing your life on someone else. Damn. You are a hypocrite. Made a whole page about me but say I talk down to people. Are you any better? What if I made a page about you? Hypocrites are the lowest forms of humans because their ideology is based on being against the same exact person they are. No wonder why you think you live on a spinning ball. Spinning ball goes well with spinning logic.

From my user talk page:

I think There’s something wrong with you , the gravity free calculator doesn’t have the same calculations but yet you’re still going off the past .. why ? Because you’re obsesse

Round 2 (28 September)

Edits by User:Backget233 (contribs):

From the wiki page:

This is the absolute peak of toxic internet irony. Oscar & friend sets up a dedicated wiki page to compile a dossier on an anonymous online user tracking their handles, platform history, and arguments and then turns around and acts like they are the victim of "vandalism" because the person tries to delete or clear out a page written entirely about them.

“Good faith” is ironic coming people who slander someone with strawman arguments The name doesn’t even have restricted in it, that’s how much inaccurate this page is lol FAN FICTION . Such a fixation . Any model that needs this much protection was never science . Keep proving me right , if it was science the model would be ENCOURAGED for falsification

This is pure fan fiction behavior. Not only are you saying "good faith," good faith is not writing about somebody, putting up a profile, strawmanning their whole argument, putting the account... the account's not even under the right name. The name no longer even has "restricted" in it. This is fan fiction behavior. This is a fan fiction account. This is fan fiction obsession. Like, if your model needs this much protection, you're proving in real time it's not a science.

When does science need this much protection? No, only an unfalsifiable model needs this much protection. And you're getting upset that someone is vandalizing a page, slandering and strawmanning. It's ironic. This is internet brain rot. You haven't met the person. You don't even know the person's name. But yet you think you know, you're so comfortable writing about a person you don't even know because they have opposing views.

From this talk page:

This is the absolute peak of toxic internet irony. Oscar & friend sets up a dedicated wiki page to compile a dossier on an anonymous online user tracking their handles, platform history, and arguments and then turns around and acts like they are the victim of "vandalism" because the person tries to delete or clear out a page written entirely about them.

The name isn’t even restricted anymore . Pure brain rot over a model

“Good faith” is ironic coming people who slander someone with strawman arguments The name doesn’t even have restricted in it, that’s how much inaccurate this page is lol FAN FICTION . Such a fixation . Any model that needs this much protection was never science . Keep proving me right , if it was science the model would be ENCOURAGED for falsification

This is pure fan fiction behavior. Not only are you saying "good faith," good faith is not writing about somebody, putting up a profile, strawmanning their whole argument, putting the account... the account's not even under the right name. The name no longer even has "restricted" in it. This is fan fiction behavior. This is a fan fiction account. This is fan fiction obsession. Like, if your model needs this much protection, you're proving in real time it's not a science.

When does science need this much protection? No, only an unfalsifiable model needs this much protection. And you're getting upset that someone is vandalizing a page, slandering and strawmanning. It's ironic. This is internet brain rot. You haven't met the person. You don't even know the person's name. But yet you think you know, you're so comfortable writing about a person you don't even know because they have opposing views.

From my user page:

I edit Flerfipedia & write fan fiction because Im that obsessed . The gravity free calcs are updated but you won’t accept it because you haven’t seen it, ironic because that’s the same standard I have For gravity not being isolated but you don’t have . Just brain rot obsession at this point.

The calcs no longer have the same equations but I guess It’s more about slander then about being accurate

From my user talk page:

What about what you’re doing is rooted in science , I’ll answer, NOTHING !!

Dogma captain here . You don’t like the same treatment you do to others . Then stop being a hypocrite. Fan fiction lol it’s amazing Oscar . You would rather write about someone you don’t know . Proving that this model is no longer science. You are protecting a religion

Edits by User:Theirony (contribs):

From the wiki page:

THERE IS NO GOOD FAITH .. LOOK WHAT YOUVE DONE .. the opposite of GOOD FAITH .. TOO MUCH OF A HYPOCRITE TO SEE THAT ..

The GRAVITY CALCS HAVE BEEN CHANGED . The name is NO LONGER RESTRICTED. This is fan fiction obsessive behavior for difference of opinion

There is no good faith in dedicating an entire page to smearing someone you do not know based on information you actively strawman. Preaching tolerance and objectivity while maintaining an anonymous hit piece is a profound display of irony, turning what should be open inquiry into a closed loop dogmatic defense mechanism. True science thrives on falsification, welcoming rigorous stress tests, vacuum boundaries, and explicit losing conditions that put a model genuinely at risk. Yet, rather than engaging with the actual architecture, transparent calculators, or precommitted adjudication rules of the framework, the critics choose to double down on outdated caricatures and personal attacks because protecting their narrative matters more to them than discovering objective truth.

From my user talk page:

You can’t see the forest for the trees because you are too busy in your dogmatic loop .

What are you calling good faith is hypocrisy. You strawman someone’s whole argument, write fan fiction about someone you don’t even know their first name & then preach good faith . This is comical. Then you get upset when it’s being done to you . Amazing right ? It’s almost like you’re a hypocrite