Restricted: Difference between revisions
m Washcarso moved page Restricted List to Restricted: Changed his name |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{infobox | {{infobox | ||
| | |papa=[[Dave Weiss]] | ||
|alias=restricted_list<br>channel_restricted<br>Restricted | |||
|caption=restricted_list's profile on Threads as of September 2026 | |caption=restricted_list's profile on Threads as of September 2026 | ||
|platform=[https://www.threads.com/@restricted_list Threads] | |platform=[https://www.threads.com/@restricted_list Threads] | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''restricted_list''' is a United States-based flerf who posts on {{wp|Threads (social network)|Threads}}. He regularly argues with [[globers]] on the platform, and seems to rely excessively on {{wp|chatbot|AI}} to refute | '''channel_restricted''' (formerly '''restricted_list''') is a United States-based flerf who posts on {{wp|Threads (social network)|Threads}}. He regularly argues with [[globers]] on the platform, and seems to rely excessively on {{wp|chatbot|AI}} to refute arguments. If it wasn't for his sheer persistence in spreading flat Earth bullshit, there would be no reason to doubt him being a [[Poe]]. | ||
==Arguments and tactics== | ==Arguments and tactics== | ||
| Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
He posts out-of-context memes as "evidence", then refuses to provide sources. | He posts out-of-context memes as "evidence", then refuses to provide sources. | ||
He maintains that gravity is unfalsifiable because "you can't remove gravity from mass" and "you can't shield gravity". | He maintains that gravity is unfalsifiable because "you can't remove gravity from mass" and "you can't shield gravity". He seems to justify that his own explanation for weight (some vague combination of density and electrostatics) doesn't need to be held to the same standard. | ||
He thinks being able to see faces in photos of Earth means they're fake (because NASA is intentionally hiding faces for people to find). | He thinks being able to see faces in photos of Earth means they're fake (because NASA is intentionally hiding faces for people to find). | ||
| Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
=="Gravity-free" calculator== | =="Gravity-free" calculator== | ||
Recently, | Recently, Restricted has claimed to have developed a fully functioning calculator for predicting rates of fall without using gravity. | ||
Of course, his "gravity-free" calculator uses gravity; {{wp|Gravity of Earth|g}} has just been substituted out for the atmosphere's pressure gradient, which is calculated using g because it relies on gravity existing. Whatever AI he asked to make the calculator likely interpreted his prompt as "a calculator that does not ''directly'' use g or {{wp|gravitational constant|G}}". | Of course, his "gravity-free" calculator uses gravity; {{wp|Gravity of Earth|g}} has just been substituted out for the atmosphere's pressure gradient, which is calculated using g because it relies on gravity existing. Whatever AI he asked to make the calculator likely interpreted his prompt as "a calculator that does not ''directly'' use g or {{wp|gravitational constant|G}}". | ||
| Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
===="Density/pressure acceleration"==== | ===="Density/pressure acceleration"==== | ||
This equation is actually all that is needed to fully account for 9.8 m/s<sup>2</sup>, but this is because its mathematically identical to gravity plus buoyancy. (Note that in its current configuration, the calculator is outputting ~9.5 m/s<sup>2</sup> due to its use of incorrect values for ''medium density'' and ''pressure gradient''. | This equation is actually all that is needed to fully account for 9.8 m/s<sup>2</sup>, but this is because its mathematically identical to gravity plus buoyancy. (Note that in its current configuration, the calculator is outputting ~9.5 m/s<sup>2</sup> due to its use of incorrect values for ''medium density'' and ''pressure gradient''. Restricted seems perfectly happy with this error though, despite having asserted gravity was falsified after Newton's law was {{wp|Newton's law of universal gravitation#Observations conflicting with Newton's formula|off by 43 arcseconds per century}}). | ||
The equation is | The equation is | ||
| Line 44: | Line 45: | ||
: <math>\frac{dP}{dz} = -\rho g</math> | : <math>\frac{dP}{dz} = -\rho g</math> | ||
An attentive observer will note that this is the same as | An attentive observer will note that this is the same as Restricted's formula but without <math>1/\rho_{\mathrm{object}}</math>. This is because his formula is not explaining where the acceleration comes from, its using the fact that a downward acceleration is already acting on the fluid to cause a pressure gradient. As <math>\rho_{\mathrm{object}}</math> approaches infinity, the buoyant force approaches zero, causing the value of a to approach the value of g (because it approaches the hydrostatic equilibrium formula). | ||
The <math>1/\rho_{\mathrm{object}}</math> is simply adding the effect of buoyancy, resulting in a slightly lower acceleration than g. In fact, his equation can be directly derived from the formulae for gravity and buoyancy: | The <math>1/\rho_{\mathrm{object}}</math> is simply adding the effect of buoyancy, resulting in a slightly lower acceleration than g. In fact, his equation can be directly derived from the formulae for gravity and buoyancy: | ||
| Line 66: | Line 67: | ||
: <math>a = -\frac{1}{\rho_{\mathrm{fluid}}} \frac{dP}{dz} \left (\frac{\rho_{\mathrm{fluid}}}{\rho_{\mathrm{object}}}-1 \right)</math> | : <math>a = -\frac{1}{\rho_{\mathrm{fluid}}} \frac{dP}{dz} \left (\frac{\rho_{\mathrm{fluid}}}{\rho_{\mathrm{object}}}-1 \right)</math> | ||
This simplifies to | This simplifies to Restricted's equation. In the last step, g is substituted using the hydrostatic equilibrium formula (shown earlier). | ||
===="Electrostatic acceleration"==== | ===="Electrostatic acceleration"==== | ||
This relies on object polarisability and a non-uniform electric field. The Earth's atmosphere does indeed have a non-uniform electric field (starting at around 100 V/m then decreasing with height), but ∇ E is nowhere near great enough to noticeably accelerate a macroscopic object. | This relies on object polarisability and a non-uniform electric field. The Earth's atmosphere does indeed have a non-uniform electric field (starting at around 100 V/m then decreasing with height), but ∇ E is nowhere near great enough to noticeably accelerate a macroscopic object. | ||
===Claims about the calculator=== | |||
===="The calculations predate Newtonian calculations"==== | |||
The equation uses <math>dP/dz</math>, a derivative operator in calculus. {{wp|Isaac Newton|I wonder who invented calculus?}} | |||
===="The calculations work in a vacuum"==== | |||
Not only do the calculations not work in a vacuum, they don't work for any other air density unless you recalculate the pressure gradient. How does one calculate the pressure gradient? Using gravitational field strength, g. | |||
==Use of AI== | ==Use of AI== | ||
He has convinced chatbots like Gemini to agree with him on his flat Earth talking points. ''Because real research involves listening to AI's opinions, especially when AI's opinions are designed to be aligned with your own.'' | He has convinced chatbots like Gemini to agree with him on his flat Earth talking points. ''Because real research involves listening to AI's opinions, especially when AI's opinions are designed to be aligned with your own.'' | ||
[[File:Restricted list AI heliocentric falsifiability.jpeg|thumb|Screenshot of Gemini | [[File:Restricted list AI heliocentric falsifiability.jpeg|thumb|Screenshot of Gemini Restricted posted to support the idea that the {{wp|heliocentric model}} is "unflasifiable".]] | ||
==Other info== | ==Other info== | ||
Revision as of 22:07, 26 September 2026
| Real name | unknown |
|---|---|
| Alias(es) | restricted_list channel_restricted Restricted |
| Main platform | Threads |
| Papa flerf | Dave Weiss |
| Flerfzi? | not yet confirmed |
| Religiflerf? | unknown |
| Incel? | not yet confirmed |
| Drinks urine? | not yet confirmed |
| Adopted by | not adopted yet |
| Teeth | slightly less than full set |
channel_restricted (formerly restricted_list) is a United States-based flerf who posts on Threads
. He regularly argues with globers on the platform, and seems to rely excessively on AI
to refute arguments. If it wasn't for his sheer persistence in spreading flat Earth bullshit, there would be no reason to doubt him being a Poe.
Arguments and tactics
He has pushed truly some of the dumbest flat-earth arguments on the planet.
He posts out-of-context memes as "evidence", then refuses to provide sources.
He maintains that gravity is unfalsifiable because "you can't remove gravity from mass" and "you can't shield gravity". He seems to justify that his own explanation for weight (some vague combination of density and electrostatics) doesn't need to be held to the same standard.
He thinks being able to see faces in photos of Earth means they're fake (because NASA is intentionally hiding faces for people to find).
He consistently demonstrates all three laws of flerf to an exceptional standard.
"Gravity-free" calculator
Recently, Restricted has claimed to have developed a fully functioning calculator for predicting rates of fall without using gravity.
Of course, his "gravity-free" calculator uses gravity; g
has just been substituted out for the atmosphere's pressure gradient, which is calculated using g because it relies on gravity existing. Whatever AI he asked to make the calculator likely interpreted his prompt as "a calculator that does not directly use g or G
".
Link to the calculator on Google Sheets
Equations used in the calculator
The calculator outputs two acceleration values; one due to "density/pressure" and one due to "electrostatics". The two accelerations are then added together to get the net acceleration.
"Density/pressure acceleration"
This equation is actually all that is needed to fully account for 9.8 m/s2, but this is because its mathematically identical to gravity plus buoyancy. (Note that in its current configuration, the calculator is outputting ~9.5 m/s2 due to its use of incorrect values for medium density and pressure gradient. Restricted seems perfectly happy with this error though, despite having asserted gravity was falsified after Newton's law was off by 43 arcseconds per century
).
The equation is
Where
- is the atmosphere's pressure gradient.
of a fluid is calculated using gravitational field strength, g, in the hydrostatic equilibrium
formula:
An attentive observer will note that this is the same as Restricted's formula but without . This is because his formula is not explaining where the acceleration comes from, its using the fact that a downward acceleration is already acting on the fluid to cause a pressure gradient. As approaches infinity, the buoyant force approaches zero, causing the value of a to approach the value of g (because it approaches the hydrostatic equilibrium formula).
The is simply adding the effect of buoyancy, resulting in a slightly lower acceleration than g. In fact, his equation can be directly derived from the formulae for gravity and buoyancy:
| Gravity | Buoyancy | Net force |
|---|---|---|
This simplifies to Restricted's equation. In the last step, g is substituted using the hydrostatic equilibrium formula (shown earlier).
"Electrostatic acceleration"
This relies on object polarisability and a non-uniform electric field. The Earth's atmosphere does indeed have a non-uniform electric field (starting at around 100 V/m then decreasing with height), but ∇ E is nowhere near great enough to noticeably accelerate a macroscopic object.
Claims about the calculator
"The calculations predate Newtonian calculations"
The equation uses , a derivative operator in calculus. I wonder who invented calculus?
"The calculations work in a vacuum"
Not only do the calculations not work in a vacuum, they don't work for any other air density unless you recalculate the pressure gradient. How does one calculate the pressure gradient? Using gravitational field strength, g.
Use of AI
He has convinced chatbots like Gemini to agree with him on his flat Earth talking points. Because real research involves listening to AI's opinions, especially when AI's opinions are designed to be aligned with your own.

is "unflasifiable".Other info
- Thinks the Sun is in the clouds
- Adheres to flerfspective