Jump to content

User talk:Washcarso: Difference between revisions

From Flerf Wiki
Tag: Reverted
m Reverted edits by Backget233 (talk) to last revision by Washcarso
Tag: Rollback
Line 1: Line 1:
Nothing what you’re doing is rooted in science, it’s pure fan fiction
Thanks for honoring me on the Globers page [[User:Ttguy|Ttguy]] ([[User talk:Ttguy|talk]]) 08:38, 28 June 2026 (EDT)


This is pure dogma  . You don’t like the same treatment you do to others . Then stop being a hypocrite. Fan fiction lol it’s amazing Oscar . You would rather write about someone you don’t know . Proving that this model is no longer science. You are protecting a religion
No problem! [[User:Washcarso|Washcarso]] ([[User talk:Washcarso|talk]]) 01:48, 29 June 2026 (EDT)


== dogma not science  ==
== Good job! ==


This is pure dogma, not science. You are creating an account about someone you don't know. The account name is not even accurate. The information is not even accurate. It's a strawman argument you created against the attacking body, and then now you're complaining that someone is removing what you wrote as a strawman against them.
Thanks for the meaningful edits and tidying things up.
How hypocritical, ironic, and brainwashed you have to be to accept the standard that you don't even accept for yourself. It is amazing how people function to protect a model while proving it's unfalsifiable while thinking it's still science.
It's an amazing closed loop that you created that you can't even understand and have the cognitive ability to process.


== karl popper would be turning in his grave ==
Thanks for the recognition 🌏 [[User:Washcarso|Washcarso]] ([[User talk:Washcarso|talk]]) 20:35, 31 July 2026 (EDT)


Everything that you're doing is rooted in dogma. Nothing about what you're doing is science. Science is encouraged to be challenged. You're proving otherwise. You're saying this is what happens when you try to challenge the model. Then it's a religion at this point. You're proving that.
== Seconded! ==
 
But my question is, when will you have the cognitive ability to realize that what you're doing is no longer science? Karl Popper would be turning in his grave to understand the level of unfalsifiability that has arrived in the model merely because of space pictures and government trust.
Awsome job! Sorry for all the extra cleaning up I've given you. Still getting the hang of it :-)
 
Martin
 
Thanks, your contributions have been great! [[User:Washcarso|Washcarso]] ([[User talk:Washcarso|talk]]) 01:22, 31 August 2026 (EDT)
 
== Thank You ==
Thank you for your tireless efforts what you do and cleaning up my junk.
Appreciate your kind words on Jamar page. TYSM. SourPounder
 
No worries, thanks for the compliments [[User:Washcarso|Washcarso]] ([[User talk:Washcarso|talk]]) 21:57, 9 September 2026 (EDT)
 
== Michael Aftias ==
Gday, his page is coming up forbidden, sounds like some of the content is triggering a block. Cheers. Sour
 
Interesting, would definitely imagine its the adult content. Hopefully an admin can recover the page. [[User:Washcarso|Washcarso]] ([[User talk:Washcarso|talk]])
 
Hopefully. I did add a YT link to his visit to a porn convention, I hope it was not my fault. Cheers. Sour
 
Some way or another, its let me access the page when I use a redirect (e.g. [[Aftias]]). I've added the source code to [[User:Washcarso/Sandbox|my sandbox]] as a backup (its not wiki markup but at least its saved).
It may or may not be the YT link, but the server seems to have flagged something (it says {{wp|LiteSpeed Web Server}}). [[User:Washcarso|Washcarso]] ([[User talk:Washcarso|talk]])
 
Great news. Too much work had gone into that to lose it. Thank you. Sour.
 
Hey Washcarso, I reached out to Toon and he addressed this, but may take a little while before it comes back online. Cheers. Sour([[User talk:SourPounder|talk]])
Update: Washcarso, you on discord? If not can you email from here. Got a little info on this issue. Cheers. Sour([[User talk:SourPounder|talk]])
 
Unfortunately not on Discord, but I believe you can send an email from my user page ("Email this user" in the side bar). Hopefully its not too hard to sort out.
In the meantime, I need to deal with this flerf that created like 6 alt accounts to vandalise his wiki page! All the best. [[User:Washcarso|Washcarso]] ([[User talk:Washcarso|talk]])
 
Just sent an email to you from flerf wiki, may want to check SPAM. Thanks.[[User:SourPounder|SourPounder]] ([[User talk:SourPounder|talk]])
 
It doesn't seem to have come through, even after checking junk etc. I've created an account you can email directly:
<code>washcarso.flerfwiki@gmail.com</code>
[[User:Washcarso|Washcarso]] ([[User talk:Washcarso|talk]]) 04:57, 28 September 2026 (EDT)
 
==Message from [[Restricted]]==
<blockquote>
I think There’s something wrong with you , the gravity free calculator doesn’t have the same calculations but yet you’re still going off the past .. why ? Because you’re obsesse
</blockquote>
 
See [[Talk:Restricted]] and we can discuss the calculator in good faith. Please don't remove messages from others on talk pages, thank you.
 
 
=== Someone is triggered! ===
You touched that special someone in a special place :)
I blocked Flawrock. Let's see what he will do with other accounts.
 
I think we need a "trusted" account group, so that we can use the protect function for certain pages to limit to users that have actually made useful contributions.
 
[[User:DoraNku|DoraNku]] ([[User talk:DoraNku|talk]]) 01:21, 28 September 2026 (EDT)
 
Thank you, DoraNku. The "trusted users" group sounds like a great idea.
Like Wikipedia, we ought to have different levels of page protection. Probably something like:
# '''Autoconfirmed'''
# '''Trusted users'''
# '''Administrators''' (probably won't ever need to go this high)
 
If possible, it might be a good idea to have a delay between when an account is created and when it is autoconfirmed, e.g. a couple days. At the moment, it seems to autoconfirm upon account creation (Flawrock was listed as autoconfirmed).
That way not every vulnerable page will need to go as high as "trusted users" protection.
 
Current group rights are listed at [[Special:ListGroupRights]].
 
Thanks for your help. [[User:Washcarso|Washcarso]] ([[User talk:Washcarso|talk]]) 02:18, 28 September 2026 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:10, 28 September 2026

Thanks for honoring me on the Globers page Ttguy (talk) 08:38, 28 June 2026 (EDT)

No problem! Washcarso (talk) 01:48, 29 June 2026 (EDT)

Good job!

Thanks for the meaningful edits and tidying things up.

Thanks for the recognition 🌏 Washcarso (talk) 20:35, 31 July 2026 (EDT)

Seconded!

Awsome job! Sorry for all the extra cleaning up I've given you. Still getting the hang of it :-)

Martin

Thanks, your contributions have been great! Washcarso (talk) 01:22, 31 August 2026 (EDT)

Thank You

Thank you for your tireless efforts what you do and cleaning up my junk. Appreciate your kind words on Jamar page. TYSM. SourPounder

No worries, thanks for the compliments Washcarso (talk) 21:57, 9 September 2026 (EDT)

Michael Aftias

Gday, his page is coming up forbidden, sounds like some of the content is triggering a block. Cheers. Sour

Interesting, would definitely imagine its the adult content. Hopefully an admin can recover the page. Washcarso (talk)

Hopefully. I did add a YT link to his visit to a porn convention, I hope it was not my fault. Cheers. Sour

Some way or another, its let me access the page when I use a redirect (e.g. Aftias). I've added the source code to my sandbox as a backup (its not wiki markup but at least its saved). It may or may not be the YT link, but the server seems to have flagged something (it says LiteSpeed Web Server). Washcarso (talk)

Great news. Too much work had gone into that to lose it. Thank you. Sour.

Hey Washcarso, I reached out to Toon and he addressed this, but may take a little while before it comes back online. Cheers. Sour(talk) Update: Washcarso, you on discord? If not can you email from here. Got a little info on this issue. Cheers. Sour(talk)

Unfortunately not on Discord, but I believe you can send an email from my user page ("Email this user" in the side bar). Hopefully its not too hard to sort out. In the meantime, I need to deal with this flerf that created like 6 alt accounts to vandalise his wiki page! All the best. Washcarso (talk)

Just sent an email to you from flerf wiki, may want to check SPAM. Thanks.SourPounder (talk)

It doesn't seem to have come through, even after checking junk etc. I've created an account you can email directly: washcarso.flerfwiki@gmail.com Washcarso (talk) 04:57, 28 September 2026 (EDT)

Message from Restricted

I think There’s something wrong with you , the gravity free calculator doesn’t have the same calculations but yet you’re still going off the past .. why ? Because you’re obsesse

See Talk:Restricted and we can discuss the calculator in good faith. Please don't remove messages from others on talk pages, thank you.


Someone is triggered!

You touched that special someone in a special place :) I blocked Flawrock. Let's see what he will do with other accounts.

I think we need a "trusted" account group, so that we can use the protect function for certain pages to limit to users that have actually made useful contributions.

DoraNku (talk) 01:21, 28 September 2026 (EDT)

Thank you, DoraNku. The "trusted users" group sounds like a great idea. Like Wikipedia, we ought to have different levels of page protection. Probably something like:

  1. Autoconfirmed
  2. Trusted users
  3. Administrators (probably won't ever need to go this high)

If possible, it might be a good idea to have a delay between when an account is created and when it is autoconfirmed, e.g. a couple days. At the moment, it seems to autoconfirm upon account creation (Flawrock was listed as autoconfirmed). That way not every vulnerable page will need to go as high as "trusted users" protection.

Current group rights are listed at Special:ListGroupRights.

Thanks for your help. Washcarso (talk) 02:18, 28 September 2026 (EDT)