User talk:Washcarso: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Backget233 (talk | contribs) →karl popper would be turning in his grave: new section |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Nothing what you’re doing is rooted in science, it’s pure fan fiction | |||
This is pure dogma . You don’t like the same treatment you do to others . Then stop being a hypocrite. Fan fiction lol it’s amazing Oscar . You would rather write about someone you don’t know . Proving that this model is no longer science. You are protecting a religion | |||
== | == dogma not science == | ||
This is pure dogma, not science. You are creating an account about someone you don't know. The account name is not even accurate. The information is not even accurate. It's a strawman argument you created against the attacking body, and then now you're complaining that someone is removing what you wrote as a strawman against them. | |||
How hypocritical, ironic, and brainwashed you have to be to accept the standard that you don't even accept for yourself. It is amazing how people function to protect a model while proving it's unfalsifiable while thinking it's still science. | |||
It's an amazing closed loop that you created that you can't even understand and have the cognitive ability to process. | |||
== karl popper would be turning in his grave == | |||
Everything that you're doing is rooted in dogma. Nothing about what you're doing is science. Science is encouraged to be challenged. You're proving otherwise. You're saying this is what happens when you try to challenge the model. Then it's a religion at this point. You're proving that. | |||
But my question is, when will you have the cognitive ability to realize that what you're doing is no longer science? Karl Popper would be turning in his grave to understand the level of unfalsifiability that has arrived in the model merely because of space pictures and government trust. | |||
Latest revision as of 09:28, 28 September 2026
Nothing what you’re doing is rooted in science, it’s pure fan fiction
This is pure dogma . You don’t like the same treatment you do to others . Then stop being a hypocrite. Fan fiction lol it’s amazing Oscar . You would rather write about someone you don’t know . Proving that this model is no longer science. You are protecting a religion
dogma not science
This is pure dogma, not science. You are creating an account about someone you don't know. The account name is not even accurate. The information is not even accurate. It's a strawman argument you created against the attacking body, and then now you're complaining that someone is removing what you wrote as a strawman against them.
How hypocritical, ironic, and brainwashed you have to be to accept the standard that you don't even accept for yourself. It is amazing how people function to protect a model while proving it's unfalsifiable while thinking it's still science.
It's an amazing closed loop that you created that you can't even understand and have the cognitive ability to process.
karl popper would be turning in his grave
Everything that you're doing is rooted in dogma. Nothing about what you're doing is science. Science is encouraged to be challenged. You're proving otherwise. You're saying this is what happens when you try to challenge the model. Then it's a religion at this point. You're proving that.
But my question is, when will you have the cognitive ability to realize that what you're doing is no longer science? Karl Popper would be turning in his grave to understand the level of unfalsifiability that has arrived in the model merely because of space pictures and government trust.