Restricted: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 09:15, 28 September 2026

This is the absolute peak of toxic internet irony. Oscar & friend sets up a dedicated wiki page to compile a dossier on an anonymous online user tracking their handles, platform history, and arguments and then turns around and acts like they are the victim of "vandalism" because the person tries to delete or clear out a page written entirely about them.

“Good faith” is ironic coming people who slander someone with strawman arguments The name doesn’t even have restricted in it, that’s how much inaccurate this page is lol FAN FICTION . Such a fixation . Any model that needs this much protection was never science . Keep proving me right , if it was science the model would be ENCOURAGED for falsification

This is pure fan fiction behavior. Not only are you saying "good faith," good faith is not writing about somebody, putting up a profile, strawmanning their whole argument, putting the account... the account's not even under the right name. The name no longer even has "restricted" in it. This is fan fiction behavior. This is a fan fiction account. This is fan fiction obsession. Like, if your model needs this much protection, you're proving in real time it's not a science.

When does science need this much protection? No, only an unfalsifiable model needs this much protection. And you're getting upset that someone is vandalizing a page, slandering and strawmanning. It's ironic. This is internet brain rot. You haven't met the person. You don't even know the person's name. But yet you think you know, you're so comfortable writing about a person you don't even know because they have opposing views.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{infobox
+This is the absolute peak of toxic internet irony. Oscar & friend  sets up a dedicated wiki page to compile a dossier on an anonymous online user tracking their handles, platform history, and arguments and then turns around and acts like they are the victim of "vandalism" because the person tries to delete or clear out a page written entirely about them.
-|image=File:Restricted list profile Sep 2026.jpg
-|caption=restricted_list's profile on Threads as of September 2026
-|platform=[https://www.threads.com/@restricted_list Threads]
-}}
-'''restricted_list''' is a United States-based flerf who posts on {{wp|Threads (social network)|Threads}}. He regularly argues with [[globers]] on the platform, and seems to rely excessively on {{wp|chatbot|AI}} to refute their arguments, and a result, much of his language often sounds AI-generated. He also frequently posts out-of-context memes as "evidence", then refuses to provide sources.
+“Good faith” is ironic coming people who slander someone with strawman arguments The name doesn’t even have restricted in it, that’s how much inaccurate this page is lol FAN FICTION . Such a fixation . Any model that needs this much protection was never science . Keep proving me right , if it was science the model would be ENCOURAGED for falsification
-He has pushed truly some of the dumbest flat-earth arguments on the planet. He maintains that gravity is unfalsifiable because "you can't remove gravity from mass" and "you can't shield gravity". He thinks being able to see faces in photos of Earth means they're fake (because NASA is intentionally hiding faces for people to find).
+This is pure fan fiction behavior. Not only are you saying "good faith," good faith is not writing about somebody, putting up a profile, strawmanning their whole argument, putting the account... the account's not even under the right name. The name no longer even has "restricted" in it. This is fan fiction behavior. This is a fan fiction account. This is fan fiction obsession. Like, if your model needs this much protection, you're proving in real time it's not a science.
-He consistently demonstrates all three [[laws of flerfs]] to an exceptional standard.
+When does science need this much protection? No, only an unfalsifiable model needs this much protection. And you're getting upset that someone is vandalizing a page, slandering and strawmanning. It's ironic. This is internet brain rot. You haven't met the person. You don't even know the person's name. But yet you think you know, you're so comfortable writing about a person you don't even know because they have opposing views.
-=="Gravity-free" calculator==
-Recently, restricted_list has claimed to have developed a fully functioning calculator for predicting rates of fall without using gravity.
-Of course, his "gravity-free" calculator uses gravity; "{{wp|Gravity of Earth|g}}" has just been substituted out for the atmosphere's pressure gradient, which is calculated using g because it relies on gravity existing. Whatever AI he asked to make the calculator likely interpreted his prompt as "a calculator that does not directly use g or {{wp|gravitational constant|G}}".
-[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IIem4z-BvLhE7NMXeIlthiQ6M-_77etLBG0u6j_V-Mo/edit?gid=1261802340#gid=1261802340 Link to the calculator on Google Sheets]
-==Use of AI==
-He has convinced chatbots like Gemini to agree with him on his flat Earth talking points. ''Because real research involves listening to AI's opinions, especially when AI's opinions are designed to be aligned with your own.''
-[[File:Restricted list AI heliocentric falsifiability.jpeg|thumb|Screenshot of Gemini restricted_list posted to support the idea that the {{wp|heliocentric model}} is "unflasifiable".]]
-==Other info==
-* Thinks the Sun is in the clouds
-* Adheres to [[flerfspective]]
-[[Category:American flerfs]]