Talk:Restricted - Revision history

Washcarso at 04:25, 28 September 2026

2026-09-28T04:25:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:25, 28 September 2026
Line 43:		Line 43:
	It’s not that gravity can’t be shielded or isolated from gravity. It’s that gravity can’t be isolated AT ALL!!!! Get that through your thick skull. GRAVITY HAS ONLY BEEN ASSUMED. It’s never been unequivocally isolated in a lab. ELECTROSTATIC HAS BEEN. Deleted everything & assuming what’s left is not ISOLATION. What happens when I create a new force on top of gravity & don’t have to have it isolated to prove itself? YOU’LL SAY IT’S FAKE. But that’s exactly the special pleading gravity has. ALL THE EXPERIMENTS ASSUME GRAVITY. Never proved. YOU CAN’T GRASP THAT CONCEPT because you don’t understand physics. SIMPLE AS THAT. It’s never been isolated effectively. Stop strawmanning because you can’t take accountability. It’s never been UNDOUBTEDLY ISOLATED. Electrostatic has. YOU STILL DON’T UNDERSTAND ISOLATION. Instead you should REALLY STUDY it. Shielding is one FORM of isolation. All a force needs is ONE FORM. GRAVITY HAS NO FORMS OF ISOLATION. ZERO. You cope with saying gravity is attached to mass. It shouldn’t have to be if it’s a real force. It’s a fiat force, meaning it’s backed by FAITH. That’s your inability to take accountability. So you project your insecurity & call me things because you can’t isolate gravity or manipulate it in a lab. All your model has is EXCUSES WHY SOMETHING CAN’T HAPPEN. More excuses. You wrote a whole page about me because you’re insecure. How about you go build something on your threads page with your 4 followers instead of basing your life on someone else. Damn. You are a hypocrite. Made a whole page about me but say I talk down to people. Are you any better? What if I made a page about you? Hypocrites are the lowest forms of humans because their ideology is based on being against the same exact person they are. No wonder why you think you live on a spinning ball. Spinning ball goes well with spinning logic.		It’s not that gravity can’t be shielded or isolated from gravity. It’s that gravity can’t be isolated AT ALL!!!! Get that through your thick skull. GRAVITY HAS ONLY BEEN ASSUMED. It’s never been unequivocally isolated in a lab. ELECTROSTATIC HAS BEEN. Deleted everything & assuming what’s left is not ISOLATION. What happens when I create a new force on top of gravity & don’t have to have it isolated to prove itself? YOU’LL SAY IT’S FAKE. But that’s exactly the special pleading gravity has. ALL THE EXPERIMENTS ASSUME GRAVITY. Never proved. YOU CAN’T GRASP THAT CONCEPT because you don’t understand physics. SIMPLE AS THAT. It’s never been isolated effectively. Stop strawmanning because you can’t take accountability. It’s never been UNDOUBTEDLY ISOLATED. Electrostatic has. YOU STILL DON’T UNDERSTAND ISOLATION. Instead you should REALLY STUDY it. Shielding is one FORM of isolation. All a force needs is ONE FORM. GRAVITY HAS NO FORMS OF ISOLATION. ZERO. You cope with saying gravity is attached to mass. It shouldn’t have to be if it’s a real force. It’s a fiat force, meaning it’s backed by FAITH. That’s your inability to take accountability. So you project your insecurity & call me things because you can’t isolate gravity or manipulate it in a lab. All your model has is EXCUSES WHY SOMETHING CAN’T HAPPEN. More excuses. You wrote a whole page about me because you’re insecure. How about you go build something on your threads page with your 4 followers instead of basing your life on someone else. Damn. You are a hypocrite. Made a whole page about me but say I talk down to people. Are you any better? What if I made a page about you? Hypocrites are the lowest forms of humans because their ideology is based on being against the same exact person they are. No wonder why you think you live on a spinning ball. Spinning ball goes well with spinning logic.
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>

			[[User:Washcarso\|Washcarso]] ([[User talk:Washcarso\|talk]]) 00:25, 28 September 2026 (EDT)

	<!-- START NEW SECTION BELOW THIS LINE -->		<!-- START NEW SECTION BELOW THIS LINE -->

Washcarso at 04:07, 28 September 2026

2026-09-28T04:07:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 28 September 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Updated calculator==
			These are the messages left by Restricted's various accounts on various pages. Restricted, you are free to say what you want and I wont delete it, but '''it needs to be on this discussion page'''. And from now on, '''do not delete anyone else's messages from discussion pages'''.

			I will review your updated calculator if you provide a link to it. Start a new section '''below this one''' and paste the link.

			From the wiki page:

			<blockquote>
			The GRAVITY FREE CALCS HAVE BEEN UPDATED The calculator no longer derives its pressure gradient from previous or any g type of hydrostatic equation. Pressure is taken from raw measurements, medium density is independently recalculated from local pressure and temperature, object density is measured and neither G nor g appears in the calculation engine. .. so you are no longer focused on being accurate . It’s obsession over a person for a disagreement. Sick behavior .. you realizing you are proving your model isn’t science right ??? Are you okay Oscar . Do you want a page about you .. cause that’s the next move .. please keep it up

			Hi, I'm a glober & I have dogma, and it's bad. So bad I stalk pages of people I don't even know and made a page because I obviously need to PROTECT MY MODEL. Why does it need this much protection if it was genuinely falsifiable? Because it's not. I take it right to the heart, and I'll gladly do it again because I have dogma. Science is encouraged to be challenged, but not this model, because by repeatedly updating a profile I don't know about the person, it's proving it's pseudoscience every time I loop back around and post misinformation about someone I've never met. You see how sick that is. I write about people I don't even know their first name because I'm a glober & my model is unfalsifiable, meaning I'm so blinded I think there's no possible way the photos can be faked. Even though “it’s photoshop but it has to be” I don't care about that. Space is the place I've never been to, but I imagine it so hard it's like I've been there. I depend on strawman arguments & being a victim because my dogma says so.

			And yes, I'll do it again. Again & again until my unfalsifiable model remains unfalsifiable.

			It's literally dogma. If my model were actual science, it could be genuinely challenged & encouraged to be, but of course it can't be challenged. I HAVE TO protect it like a guard dog, because it's dogma. That's what dogma does: it ignores logic and lets raw emotion run the entire framework because it's a fragile pseudoscience.

			I promise you, I'll do it again. I'll watch him & race back over here to change everything back just like I always do, proving the entire point. I have to protect the model.

			UPDATE…..The calculation architecture has been completely UPDATED and decoupled from hydrostatics, buoyancy, and density metrics. The model no longer relies on those calculations at all, yet it CONTINUES to output the exact same baseline acceleration results. THE CALCULATOR IS MORE USER FRIENDLY & stronger than ever now. As a glober I will have to pretend that's not the cxase because that's my only line of defense. I'll say something like he hasn't shown it yet. That's because I can't find his page to ask.

			This completely shatters this page's recycled critiques. They claim electrostatics is 'not strong enough,' even though it is a trillion times stronger than gravity. That's an admission that makes their fiat force a smart dust by their own metrics. Gravity remains entirely unisolated and unshieldable, whereas electrostatic forces can be directly manipulated and tested in real world environments.

			Because gravity cannot be independently isolated, only ASSUMED, it operates as an unfalsifiable placeholder, chalkboard math, & the name isn't even restricted. That's how slow they are, still clinging on to the past.

			WHAT'S NEXT LOL? Is more cope & repeated strawman because I've been triggered to the point that a wiki page is my new safe haven lmao.

			Calculations 100% don't need gravity & it's more automated & user friendly than before. I can't latch on to the calculations, but I will because I have nothing left to cope with.

			I have to strawman to make my point. Because I can't use actual points. I rely on strawman arguments btw.
			</blockquote>

			From this talk page:

			<blockquote>
	UPDATE…..The calculation architecture has been completely UPDATED and decoupled from hydrostatics, buoyancy, and density metrics. The model no longer relies on those calculations at all, yet it CONTINUES to output the exact same baseline acceleration results. THE CALCULATOR IS MORE USER FRIENDLY & stronger than ever now. As a glober I will have to pretend that's not the case because that's my only line of defense. I'll say something like he hasn't shown it yet. That's because I can't find his page to ask.		UPDATE…..The calculation architecture has been completely UPDATED and decoupled from hydrostatics, buoyancy, and density metrics. The model no longer relies on those calculations at all, yet it CONTINUES to output the exact same baseline acceleration results. THE CALCULATOR IS MORE USER FRIENDLY & stronger than ever now. As a glober I will have to pretend that's not the case because that's my only line of defense. I'll say something like he hasn't shown it yet. That's because I can't find his page to ask.
			</blockquote>

			From my user page:

			<blockquote>
			My name is Oscar , & I dont Care about anything factual anymore. The gravity free calculator does not rely on buoyancy & density anymore but I dont Care because Im not here for the truth

			It’s not that gravity can’t be shielded or isolated from gravity. It’s that gravity can’t be isolated AT ALL!!!! Get that through your thick skull. GRAVITY HAS ONLY BEEN ASSUMED. It’s never been unequivocally isolated in a lab. ELECTROSTATIC HAS BEEN. Deleted everything & assuming what’s left is not ISOLATION. What happens when I create a new force on top of gravity & don’t have to have it isolated to prove itself? YOU’LL SAY IT’S FAKE. But that’s exactly the special pleading gravity has. ALL THE EXPERIMENTS ASSUME GRAVITY. Never proved. YOU CAN’T GRASP THAT CONCEPT because you don’t understand physics. SIMPLE AS THAT. It’s never been isolated effectively. Stop strawmanning because you can’t take accountability. It’s never been UNDOUBTEDLY ISOLATED. Electrostatic has. YOU STILL DON’T UNDERSTAND ISOLATION. Instead you should REALLY STUDY it. Shielding is one FORM of isolation. All a force needs is ONE FORM. GRAVITY HAS NO FORMS OF ISOLATION. ZERO. You cope with saying gravity is attached to mass. It shouldn’t have to be if it’s a real force. It’s a fiat force, meaning it’s backed by FAITH. That’s your inability to take accountability. So you project your insecurity & call me things because you can’t isolate gravity or manipulate it in a lab. All your model has is EXCUSES WHY SOMETHING CAN’T HAPPEN. More excuses. You wrote a whole page about me because you’re insecure. How about you go build something on your threads page with your 4 followers instead of basing your life on someone else. Damn. You are a hypocrite. Made a whole page about me but say I talk down to people. Are you any better? What if I made a page about you? Hypocrites are the lowest forms of humans because their ideology is based on being against the same exact person they are. No wonder why you think you live on a spinning ball. Spinning ball goes well with spinning logic.
			</blockquote>

			<!-- START NEW SECTION BELOW THIS LINE -->

Flawrock at 23:24, 27 September 2026

2026-09-27T23:24:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 27 September 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~channel_restricted hates his page so much~~, ~~he created an account, [[User:Mercury797998]]~~, and ~~{{wp\|wikipedia:Page blanking\|blanked}} the entire thing~~, ~~saying~~ it ~~was "defaming"~~. ~~The account has been blocked~~.		UPDATE…..The calculation architecture has been completely UPDATED and decoupled from hydrostatics, buoyancy, and density metrics. The model no longer relies on those calculations at all, yet it CONTINUES to output the exact same baseline acceleration results. THE CALCULATOR IS MORE USER FRIENDLY & stronger than ever now. As a glober I will have to pretend that's not the case because that's my only line of defense. I'll say something like he hasn't shown it yet. That's because I can't find his page to ask.

	I ~~can assure there is nothing written on this page~~ that ~~comes close to damaging his reputation as much as he damages his own by spreading false information each and every day, as well as~~ the ~~way he talks down to anyone~~ that ~~questions or disagrees with him.~~

	~~He very obviously can~~'~~t defend his claim that the calculator is "gravity-free"~~. ~~The honest thing to do would be to admit there is~~ '~~'currently'' no flat Earth explanation for falling, and that the flat Earth theory is a work-in progress. Instead,~~ he'~~d rather give a wrong explanation and not let anyone challenge~~ it.

	~~{{quote box\|quote=~~I ~~would rather have questions that~~ can't ~~be answered than answers that can't be questioned~~.~~\|author={{wp\|Richard Feynman}}}}~~

	~~[[User:Washcarso\|Washcarso]] ([[User talk:Washcarso\|talk]]) 07:32, 27 September 2026 (EDT)~~

Washcarso at 11:44, 27 September 2026

2026-09-27T11:44:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:44, 27 September 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I can assure there is nothing written on this page that comes close to damaging his reputation as much as he damages his own by spreading false information each and every day, as well as the way he talks down to anyone that questions or disagrees with him.		I can assure there is nothing written on this page that comes close to damaging his reputation as much as he damages his own by spreading false information each and every day, as well as the way he talks down to anyone that questions or disagrees with him.

	He very obviously can't defend his claim that the calculator is "gravity-free". The honest thing to do would be to admit there is ''currently'' no flat Earth explanation for falling, and that the flat Earth theory is a work-in progress. Instead, he'd rather ~~make false assertions~~ and not let anyone challenge ~~them~~.		He very obviously can't defend his claim that the calculator is "gravity-free". The honest thing to do would be to admit there is ''currently'' no flat Earth explanation for falling, and that the flat Earth theory is a work-in progress. Instead, he'd rather give a wrong explanation and not let anyone challenge it.

	{{quote box\|quote=I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.\|author={{wp\|Richard Feynman}}}}		{{quote box\|quote=I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.\|author={{wp\|Richard Feynman}}}}

	[[User:Washcarso\|Washcarso]] ([[User talk:Washcarso\|talk]]) 07:32, 27 September 2026 (EDT)		[[User:Washcarso\|Washcarso]] ([[User talk:Washcarso\|talk]]) 07:32, 27 September 2026 (EDT)

Washcarso: Created page with "channel_restricted hates his page so much, he created an account, User:Mercury797998, and {{wp|wikipedia:Page blanking|blanked}} the entire thing, saying it was "defaming". The account has been blocked. I can assure there is nothing written on this page that comes close to damaging his reputation as much as he damages his own by spreading false information each and every day, as well as the way he talks down to anyone that questions or disagrees with him. He very o..."

2026-09-27T11:32:49Z

Created page with "channel_restricted hates his page so much, he created an account, User:Mercury797998, and {{wp|wikipedia:Page blanking|blanked}} the entire thing, saying it was "defaming". The account has been blocked. I can assure there is nothing written on this page that comes close to damaging his reputation as much as he damages his own by spreading false information each and every day, as well as the way he talks down to anyone that questions or disagrees with him. He very o..."

New page

channel_restricted hates his page so much, he created an account, [[User:Mercury797998]], and {{wp|wikipedia:Page blanking|blanked}} the entire thing, saying it was "defaming". The account has been blocked.

I can assure there is nothing written on this page that comes close to damaging his reputation as much as he damages his own by spreading false information each and every day, as well as the way he talks down to anyone that questions or disagrees with him.

He very obviously can't defend his claim that the calculator is "gravity-free". The honest thing to do would be to admit there is ''currently'' no flat Earth explanation for falling, and that the flat Earth theory is a work-in progress. Instead, he'd rather make false assertions and not let anyone challenge them.

{{quote box|quote=I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.|author={{wp|Richard Feynman}}}}

[[User:Washcarso|Washcarso]] ([[User talk:Washcarso|talk]]) 07:32, 27 September 2026 (EDT)