Scientific Method - Revision history

Xanthopus: Format

2026-06-05T16:23:26Z

Format

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:23, 5 June 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Scientific Method:		Scientific Method:
	1) Observe Natural Phenomenon (occurring naturally in nature) see something in nature without man creating or causing it.		# Observe Natural Phenomenon (occurring naturally in nature) see something in nature without man creating or causing it.
	2) Background research & ask questions (see if anyone else has done the same experiment & explore possible reasons for the phenomena to occur) why, how, such happens.		# Background research & ask questions (see if anyone else has done the same experiment & explore possible reasons for the phenomena to occur) why, how, such happens.
	3) Develop Hypothesis (If cause A "IV", then effect B "DV") Alt Hypothesis (if A, then B) & the contrapositive Null Hypothesis (if A, then not B).		# Develop Hypothesis (If cause A "IV", then effect B "DV") Alt Hypothesis (if A, then B) & the contrapositive Null Hypothesis (if A, then not B).
	4) Experiment (Vary & manipulate the presumed cause "IV", to vary & induce the effect "DV") Keeping everything else constant/controlled "CV". Systematic experimentation validates your Hypothesis (proving the alt or the null)		# Experiment (Vary & manipulate the presumed cause "IV", to vary & induce the effect "DV") Keeping everything else constant/controlled "CV". Systematic experimentation validates your Hypothesis (proving the alt or the null)
	5) Conclusion/Publish (which Hypothesis was proven "alt or null") either of them would be proof about the observed natural phenomena in step 1, and would be part of step 2 for the next researcher.		# Conclusion/Publish (which Hypothesis was proven "alt or null") either of them would be proof about the observed natural phenomena in step 1, and would be part of step 2 for the next researcher.

	[[Category:Flerf lies]]		[[Category:Flerf lies]]

PeterMarkley: Add category

2025-03-08T21:04:32Z

Add category

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 8 March 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:
	4) Experiment (Vary & manipulate the presumed cause "IV", to vary & induce the effect "DV") Keeping everything else constant/controlled "CV". Systematic experimentation validates your Hypothesis (proving the alt or the null)		4) Experiment (Vary & manipulate the presumed cause "IV", to vary & induce the effect "DV") Keeping everything else constant/controlled "CV". Systematic experimentation validates your Hypothesis (proving the alt or the null)
	5) Conclusion/Publish (which Hypothesis was proven "alt or null") either of them would be proof about the observed natural phenomena in step 1, and would be part of step 2 for the next researcher.		5) Conclusion/Publish (which Hypothesis was proven "alt or null") either of them would be proof about the observed natural phenomena in step 1, and would be part of step 2 for the next researcher.

			[[Category:Flerf lies]]

91.175.207.89: Flerf scientific method

2025-03-02T11:04:42Z

Flerf scientific method

New page

This flawed method created by a flerf nammed theviking:

Scientific Method:
1) Observe Natural Phenomenon (occurring naturally in nature) see something in nature without man creating or causing it.
2) Background research & ask questions (see if anyone else has done the same experiment & explore possible reasons for the phenomena to occur) why, how, such happens.
3) Develop Hypothesis (If cause A "IV", then effect B "DV") Alt Hypothesis (if A, then B) & the contrapositive Null Hypothesis (if A, then not B).
4) Experiment (Vary & manipulate the presumed cause "IV", to vary & induce the effect "DV") Keeping everything else constant/controlled "CV". Systematic experimentation validates your Hypothesis (proving the alt or the null)
5) Conclusion/Publish (which Hypothesis was proven "alt or null") either of them would be proof about the observed natural phenomena in step 1, and would be part of step 2 for the next researcher.