Curved visual space - Revision history

PeterMarkley: Add doi number as visible text

2025-11-19T04:42:59Z

Add doi number as visible text

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:42, 19 November 2025
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Another phraseology is “we see in hyperbolic geometry, not Euclidean geometry.”		Another phraseology is “we see in hyperbolic geometry, not Euclidean geometry.”

	It comes from a paper that studied human visual processing and spatial judgment after an image has already been converted to nerve signals; in other words, '''not related whatsoever to optics or the geometry of light.'''<ref>Koenderink, Doorn, and Lappin. ''Perception,'' 2000. [https://doi.org/10.1068/p2921 “Direct Measurement of the Curvature of Visual Space”]</ref>		It comes from a paper that studied human visual processing and spatial judgment after an image has already been converted to nerve signals; in other words, '''not related whatsoever to optics or the geometry of light.'''<ref>Koenderink, Doorn, and Lappin. ''Perception,'' 2000. [https://doi.org/10.1068/p2921 “Direct Measurement of the Curvature of Visual Space”] DOI:10.1068/p2921</ref>

	Furthermore:		Furthermore:

PeterMarkley: Fix typo

2025-11-19T04:34:51Z

Fix typo

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:34, 19 November 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:
	* The same paper mentions a measurement of earth curvature.		* The same paper mentions a measurement of earth curvature.
	* It states earth is a globe.		* It states earth is a globe.
	* To establish a geometric standard ~~for comparing~~ the spatial judgments of the experiment subjects, they used a theodolite.		* To establish a geometric standard, against which to compare the spatial judgments of the experiment subjects, they used a theodolite.

	= References =		= References =

PeterMarkley: Add mention that paper explicitly favors globe

2025-11-19T04:33:48Z

Add mention that paper explicitly favors globe

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:33, 19 November 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:

	It comes from a paper that studied human visual processing and spatial judgment after an image has already been converted to nerve signals; in other words, '''not related whatsoever to optics or the geometry of light.'''<ref>Koenderink, Doorn, and Lappin. ''Perception,'' 2000. [https://doi.org/10.1068/p2921 “Direct Measurement of the Curvature of Visual Space”]</ref>		It comes from a paper that studied human visual processing and spatial judgment after an image has already been converted to nerve signals; in other words, '''not related whatsoever to optics or the geometry of light.'''<ref>Koenderink, Doorn, and Lappin. ''Perception,'' 2000. [https://doi.org/10.1068/p2921 “Direct Measurement of the Curvature of Visual Space”]</ref>

			Furthermore:
			* The same paper mentions a measurement of earth curvature.
			* It states earth is a globe.
			* To establish a geometric standard for comparing the spatial judgments of the experiment subjects, they used a theodolite.

	= References =		= References =

PeterMarkley: Create page

2025-11-19T04:29:41Z

Create page

New page

As a way to dismiss sky measurements or explain [[Flerfspective|flerfspective]], flerfs often say “we see in curved visual space.” Some notable purveyors of this retort are [[Austin Witsit]] and [[Kaleb Davis]].

Another phraseology is “we see in hyperbolic geometry, not Euclidean geometry.”

It comes from a paper that studied human visual processing and spatial judgment after an image has already been converted to nerve signals; in other words, '''not related whatsoever to optics or the geometry of light.'''<ref>Koenderink, Doorn, and Lappin. ''Perception,'' 2000. [https://doi.org/10.1068/p2921 “Direct Measurement of the Curvature of Visual Space”]</ref>

= References =
<references/>

[[Category:Flerf lies]]