Flerf Wiki - User contributions [en]

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-15T10:36:30Z

Martin:

{{Infobox
| image = File:Angle_of_Elevation.jpg
| caption = Current (09 August 2026) logo for Angle of Elevation YouTube channel
| location = Kazakhstan
| platform = YouTube
| papa = [[Nathan Oakley]]
}}

== Introduction ==
According to his profile, Angle of Elevation (AoE) joined YouTube on 12th August 2013. He has a few dozen videos.
He can be a prolific contributor on Nathan Oakley's comment section and live chats. However, he has spells where he goes AWOL, only to pop up again as if nothing happened. His disappearances could reasonably be explained by him complying with his medication regime, or by forced residence in a mental institution.

One thing that makes him stand out is his insistence that his strange version of physics and geometry is absolutely correct, while the textbooks and scientific literature are all wrong. He will demand proof/evidence while supplying none of his own and accuse people of "making stuff up" while clearly and demonstrably doing this himself.

When cornered, he has the typical flerf reactions; he'll deflect, change the subject, come up with an insult, or just go quiet. When forced, he may stay on topic for a while and then disappear.

Spelling and grammar too are typical of a flerf; dreadful.

Note, only he has the correct understanding of any physical phenomenon. He will proudly proclaim this and ignore any authoritative citation you can give.

== Known accounts ==

{| class="wikitable"
|+ Known accounts
|-
! Platform !! Account !! Status
|-
| YouTube || [https://www.youtube.com/@angleofelevation8759 Angle of Elevation] || Active
|-
|}

== Examples of Bizarre Ideas ==

=== How Lenses Work ===
AoE is very expert at optics. Telescope lenses 'bend light down', apparently making distant object lower than they are. Theodolites therefore are unreliable instruments.
<div style="margin-bottom: -90px;">
[[File:aoe_fed_2589.png|1000px|Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589]]
</div>
''Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589''
=== Sunsets ===
Reading AoE's explanation for the sun setting below the horizon is particularly painful. Here's a transcript from his video [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn0N5AJ8LUo Optical Occultation of the Sun].

<blockquote>
"Listen up people, as a flat earther myself I've heard many people ask, 'how can the Sun set on a flat Earth?' Frankly, the common answer the received from flat earthers is rather too simple to allow for complete understanding so please allow me to expand your knowledge so that you can explain it to others. Once you get it, you're going to see the beauty of its simplicity."
<span style="display: block; text-align: right; font-style: italic;"></span>
</blockquote>
Take a moment to savour the sheer arrogance and 'confident wrongness' here.
<blockquote>
"Many flat earthers claim the horizon is the limit of perspective and that things converge at the horizon. They are only partially correct. Most things we see are 3D (they have three dimensions), those being height, width and depth. While they are all of equal importance, they do not operate the same. Hold a cube to your eye and identify all three of those dimensions. Notice the height and width are straight and perpendicular to each other, but not depth. It is at an angle; this is called optically rising. You know the bottom of that cube is flat in reality but you don't perceive it that way. Your brain interprets the incident angle of the reflected light received by your eye and perceives it as optically rising depth. This effect has a limit according to distance. The science that is known as the Rayleigh criteria which is the diffraction limit but really what is the limit of your depth perspective. We call it the horizon which is always at your eye height unless diffracted down by glasses..."
</blockquote>
You get the idea.

=== The Equator is a Meridian; caught in a lie ===

For some time now AoE has been saying that great circles of the spherical Earth, and specifically the Equator, are all meridians, a term reserved for lines of longitude. A simple factual error you might think and not one to double down on. But double down he does, and it's a hard one to understand.
This came up again on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589, where AoE duly came up with a citation that he said supported his view.

[[File:aoe_fed_2593.png|600px|Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589]]
<span style="display: block;font-style: italic;">The YouTube account of Pete-s6z8l has been blocked by the oh-so fragile egoed Nathan 'Slappy' Oakley. This and other comments by him, and any other comments in reply to him, have disappeared from Oakley's content.</span></br>
Note that his source is the search engine Google, and the lack of a closing quotation mark. He refused to clarify his source, or indeed to discuss the matter anymore. A little digging was needed.
Searching for his quote "The equatorial meridian is an imaginary line that circles the Earth at 0 degrees latitude, dividing it into the Northern and Southern ." yielded no exact, or even close results. However, replacing ''equatorial meridian'' with ''equator'' returns this in the second hit:
<blockquote>
...The Equator is an imaginary line that circles the Earth at 0 degrees latitude, dividing it into the Northern and Southern...

</blockquote>
This is Google's extract from a web page at [https://www.askfilo.com askfilo.com]. Had he bothered to look at the actual website and not just Google's extract, he'd have had the complete sentence, including the word ''hemispheres'' at the end.
It looks like AoE
* Googled 'equator',
* Found a short definition in the results,
* Didn't bother to look at the source website,
* Copied Google's extract,
* Substituted equator with Equatorial Meridian,
* Tried to pass it off as an authoritative definition.
AoE is always accusing people of 'making stuff up', which is clear projection.

GottaLieToFlerf

[[Category:YouTube flerfs]]

Brian Mullin

2026-08-15T10:35:00Z

Martin:

{{Infobox
| image = File:Brian Mullin.png
| caption = IMAGE CAPTION
| realName = REALNAME HERE
| alias = SOME ALIASES
| location = LOCATION HERE
| platform = NAME OF ONE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM ONLY
| papa = [[Unknown]]
| antisemite = yes/no
| religiflerf = yes/no
| drinksUrine = yes/no (or 'exflerf')
}}
==Introduction==
Brian became famous in the FE community when - as a practicing engineer - he posted several videos in a Balls Out Physics series where he ostensibly explained why physics proved the earth was flat. He relied on the physics of the motion of aircraft but made the simple mistake of not accounting for conservation of momentum.

Brian apparently became a concave earther at some point [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CI9Jj3Gbhow Brother Earnest]

What he currently believes is unknown - he has attempted to wipe the internet of his Balls Out Physics series but it lives on in Flat Earth re postings - eg [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYEzK9HvAh5jI_Mr-w_6nscAUvhPHqBqc playlist by Darth Mojo Risin]

===Mullin the Engineer?===
Brian Mullin worked for areteengineers in 2021
https://areteengineers.com/about/
At least he is on there web site as at 28/12/2021

Brian was reported to the state board of engineers by people that were concerned with his mental capacity and his ability to function as a structural engineer.

A post on Bob the Science Guy (AKA ResearchFlatMoon) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzhA0ceareg "Rotating Airports | Brian Mullin] - 28/12/2021 by JimSmithInChiaps - He says that he was one of the people that reported Mullin to the state board of engineers - He told Mullin that he reported him and Mullin said that he welcomed the chance to present his FE view to his states board.

====Brians blurb at areteengineers.com====

Brian has over 12 years of civil and structural engineering experience in the transportation, commercial, industrial, telecommunications, and residential sectors. He has extensive experience working with city and state agencies, as well as with architects, developers, and contractors. He is currently a professional engineer licensed in North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, and Virginia. In the summer of 2017, Brian successfully completed the FHWA-NHI-13005 Safety Inspection of In-Service Highway Bridges to become a certified bridge safety inspector.

[[File:Brian mullin still working as engineer.png|300px|areteengineers website 2023]]
<span style="display: block; text-align: left; font-style: italic;">Brian Mullin at Arete Engineers</span>
==YouTube Channel==
[[File:Brian mullin balls out physics.png]]
==Linkedin==
Dead link on Linked in https://www.linkedin.com/in/brian-mullin-pe-cbsi-8372b41a9/

[[Category:YouTube flerfs]]
[[Category:Lapsed Flerf]]

File:Brian Mullin.png

2026-08-15T10:05:58Z

Martin: Screenshot of Brian Mullin

== Summary ==
Screenshot of Brian Mullin

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-15T09:51:51Z

Martin: /* Sunsets */

{{Infobox
| image = File:Angle_of_Elevation.jpg
| caption = Current (09 August 2026) logo for Angle of Elevation YouTube channel
| location = Kazakhstan
| platform = YouTube
| papa = [[Nathan Oakley]]
}}

== Introduction ==
According to his profile, Angle of Elevation (AoE) joined YouTube on 12th August 2013. He has a few dozen videos.
He can be a prolific contributor on Nathan Oakley's comment section and live chats. However, he has spells where he goes AWOL, only to pop up again as if nothing happened. His disappearances could reasonably be explained by him complying with his medication regime, or by forced residence in a mental institution.

One thing that makes him stand out is his insistence that his strange version of physics and geometry is absolutely correct, while the textbooks and scientific literature are all wrong. He will demand proof/evidence while supplying none of his own and accuse people of "making stuff up" while clearly and demonstrably doing this himself.

When cornered, he has the typical flerf reactions; he'll deflect, change the subject, come up with an insult, or just go quiet. When forced, he may stay on topic for a while and then disappear.

Spelling and grammar too are typical of a flerf; dreadful.

Note, only he has the correct understanding of any physical phenomenon. He will proudly proclaim this and ignore any authoritative citation you can give.

== Known accounts ==

{| class="wikitable"
|+ Known accounts
|-
! Platform !! Account !! Status
|-
| YouTube || [https://www.youtube.com/@angleofelevation8759 Angle of Elevation] || Active
|-
|}

== Examples of Bizarre Ideas ==

=== How Lenses Work ===
AoE is very expert at optics. Telescope lenses 'bend light down', apparently making distant object lower than they are. Theodolites therefore are unreliable instruments.
<div style="margin-bottom: -90px;">
[[File:aoe_fed_2589.png|1000px|Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589]]
</div>
''Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589''
=== Sunsets ===
Reading AoE's explanation for the sun setting below the horizon is particularly painful. Here's a transcript from his video [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn0N5AJ8LUo Optical Occultation of the Sun].

<blockquote>
"Listen up people, as a flat earther myself I've heard many people ask, 'how can the Sun set on a flat Earth?' Frankly, the common answer the received from flat earthers is rather too simple to allow for complete understanding so please allow me to expand your knowledge so that you can explain it to others. Once you get it, you're going to see the beauty of its simplicity."
<span style="display: block; text-align: right; font-style: italic;"></span>
</blockquote>
Take a moment to savour the sheer arrogance and 'confident wrongness' here.
<blockquote>
"Many flat earthers claim the horizon is the limit of perspective and that things converge at the horizon. They are only partially correct. Most things we see are 3D (they have three dimensions), those being height, width and depth. While they are all of equal importance, they do not operate the same. Hold a cube to your eye and identify all three of those dimensions. Notice the height and width are straight and perpendicular to each other, but not depth. It is at an angle; this is called optically rising. You know the bottom of that cube is flat in reality but you don't perceive it that way. Your brain interprets the incident angle of the reflected light received by your eye and perceives it as optically rising depth. This effect has a limit according to distance. The science that is known as the Rayleigh criteria which is the diffraction limit but really what is the limit of your depth perspective. We call it the horizon which is always at your eye height unless diffracted down by glasses..."
<span style="display: block; text-align: right; font-style: italic;"></span>
</blockquote>
You get the idea.

=== The Equator is a Meridian; caught in a lie ===

For some time now AoE has been saying that great circles of the spherical Earth, and specifically the Equator, are all meridians, a term reserved for lines of longitude. A simple factual error you might think and not one to double down on. But double down he does, and it's a hard one to understand.
This came up again on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589, where AoE duly came up with a citation that he said supported his view.

[[File:aoe_fed_2593.png|600px|Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589]]
<span style="display: block;font-style: italic;">The YouTube account of Pete-s6z8l has been blocked by the oh-so fragile egoed Nathan 'Slappy' Oakley. This and other comments by him, and any other comments in reply to him, have disappeared from Oakley's content.</span></br>
Note that his source is the search engine Google, and the lack of a closing quotation mark. He refused to clarify his source, or indeed to discuss the matter anymore. A little digging was needed.
Searching for his quote "The equatorial meridian is an imaginary line that circles the Earth at 0 degrees latitude, dividing it into the Northern and Southern ." yielded no exact, or even close results. However, replacing ''equatorial meridian'' with ''equator'' returns this in the second hit:
<blockquote>
...The Equator is an imaginary line that circles the Earth at 0 degrees latitude, dividing it into the Northern and Southern...

</blockquote>
This is Google's extract from a web page at [https://www.askfilo.com askfilo.com]. Had he bothered to look at the actual website and not just Google's extract, he'd have had the complete sentence, including the word ''hemispheres'' at the end.
It looks like AoE
* Googled 'equator',
* Found a short definition in the results,
* Didn't bother to look at the source website,
* Copied Google's extract,
* Substituted equator with Equatorial Meridian,
* Tried to pass it off as an authoritative definition.
AoE is always accusing people of 'making stuff up', which is clear projection.

GottaLieToFlerf

[[Category:YouTube flerfs]]

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-15T09:50:44Z

Martin:

{{Infobox
| image = File:Angle_of_Elevation.jpg
| caption = Current (09 August 2026) logo for Angle of Elevation YouTube channel
| location = Kazakhstan
| platform = YouTube
| papa = [[Nathan Oakley]]
}}

== Introduction ==
According to his profile, Angle of Elevation (AoE) joined YouTube on 12th August 2013. He has a few dozen videos.
He can be a prolific contributor on Nathan Oakley's comment section and live chats. However, he has spells where he goes AWOL, only to pop up again as if nothing happened. His disappearances could reasonably be explained by him complying with his medication regime, or by forced residence in a mental institution.

One thing that makes him stand out is his insistence that his strange version of physics and geometry is absolutely correct, while the textbooks and scientific literature are all wrong. He will demand proof/evidence while supplying none of his own and accuse people of "making stuff up" while clearly and demonstrably doing this himself.

When cornered, he has the typical flerf reactions; he'll deflect, change the subject, come up with an insult, or just go quiet. When forced, he may stay on topic for a while and then disappear.

Spelling and grammar too are typical of a flerf; dreadful.

Note, only he has the correct understanding of any physical phenomenon. He will proudly proclaim this and ignore any authoritative citation you can give.

== Known accounts ==

{| class="wikitable"
|+ Known accounts
|-
! Platform !! Account !! Status
|-
| YouTube || [https://www.youtube.com/@angleofelevation8759 Angle of Elevation] || Active
|-
|}

== Examples of Bizarre Ideas ==

=== How Lenses Work ===
AoE is very expert at optics. Telescope lenses 'bend light down', apparently making distant object lower than they are. Theodolites therefore are unreliable instruments.
<div style="margin-bottom: -90px;">
[[File:aoe_fed_2589.png|1000px|Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589]]
</div>
''Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589''
=== Sunsets ===
Reading AoE's explanation for the sun setting below the horizon is particularly painful. Here's a transcript from his video 'Optical Occultation of the Sun' ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn0N5AJ8LUo]).

<blockquote>
"Listen up people, as a flat earther myself I've heard many people ask, 'how can the Sun set on a flat Earth?' Frankly, the common answer the received from flat earthers is rather too simple to allow for complete understanding so please allow me to expand your knowledge so that you can explain it to others. Once you get it, you're going to see the beauty of its simplicity."
<span style="display: block; text-align: right; font-style: italic;"></span>
</blockquote>
Take a moment to savour the sheer arrogance and 'confident wrongness' here.
<blockquote>
"Many flat earthers claim the horizon is the limit of perspective and that things converge at the horizon. They are only partially correct. Most things we see are 3D (they have three dimensions), those being height, width and depth. While they are all of equal importance, they do not operate the same. Hold a cube to your eye and identify all three of those dimensions. Notice the height and width are straight and perpendicular to each other, but not depth. It is at an angle; this is called optically rising. You know the bottom of that cube is flat in reality but you don't perceive it that way. Your brain interprets the incident angle of the reflected light received by your eye and perceives it as optically rising depth. This effect has a limit according to distance. The science that is known as the Rayleigh criteria which is the diffraction limit but really what is the limit of your depth perspective. We call it the horizon which is always at your eye height unless diffracted down by glasses..."
<span style="display: block; text-align: right; font-style: italic;"></span>
</blockquote>
You get the idea.
=== The Equator is a Meridian; caught in a lie ===

For some time now AoE has been saying that great circles of the spherical Earth, and specifically the Equator, are all meridians, a term reserved for lines of longitude. A simple factual error you might think and not one to double down on. But double down he does, and it's a hard one to understand.
This came up again on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589, where AoE duly came up with a citation that he said supported his view.

[[File:aoe_fed_2593.png|600px|Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589]]
<span style="display: block;font-style: italic;">The YouTube account of Pete-s6z8l has been blocked by the oh-so fragile egoed Nathan 'Slappy' Oakley. This and other comments by him, and any other comments in reply to him, have disappeared from Oakley's content.</span></br>
Note that his source is the search engine Google, and the lack of a closing quotation mark. He refused to clarify his source, or indeed to discuss the matter anymore. A little digging was needed.
Searching for his quote "The equatorial meridian is an imaginary line that circles the Earth at 0 degrees latitude, dividing it into the Northern and Southern ." yielded no exact, or even close results. However, replacing ''equatorial meridian'' with ''equator'' returns this in the second hit:
<blockquote>
...The Equator is an imaginary line that circles the Earth at 0 degrees latitude, dividing it into the Northern and Southern...

</blockquote>
This is Google's extract from a web page at [https://www.askfilo.com askfilo.com]. Had he bothered to look at the actual website and not just Google's extract, he'd have had the complete sentence, including the word ''hemispheres'' at the end.
It looks like AoE
* Googled 'equator',
* Found a short definition in the results,
* Didn't bother to look at the source website,
* Copied Google's extract,
* Substituted equator with Equatorial Meridian,
* Tried to pass it off as an authoritative definition.
AoE is always accusing people of 'making stuff up', which is clear projection.

GottaLieToFlerf

[[Category:YouTube flerfs]]

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-15T09:49:10Z

Martin: /* The Equator is a Meridian; caught in a lie */

{{Infobox
| image = File:Angle_of_Elevation.jpg
| caption = Current (09 August 2026) logo for Angle of Elevation YouTube channel
| location = Kazakhstan
| platform = YouTube
| papa = [[Nathan Oakley]]
}}

== Introduction ==
According to his profile, Angle of Elevation (AoE) joined YouTube on 12th August 2013. He has a few dozen videos.
He can be a prolific contributor on Nathan Oakley's comment section and live chats. However, he has spells where he goes AWOL, only to pop up again as if nothing happened. His disappearances could reasonably be explained by him complying with his medication regime, or by forced residence in a mental institution.

One thing that makes him stand out is his insistence that his strange version of physics and geometry is absolutely correct, while the textbooks and scientific literature are all wrong. He will demand proof/evidence while supplying none of his own and accuse people of "making stuff up" while clearly and demonstrably doing this himself.

When cornered, he has the typical flerf reactions; he'll deflect, change the subject, come up with an insult, or just go quiet. When forced, he may stay on topic for a while and then disappear.

Spelling and grammar too are typical of a flerf; dreadful.

Note, only he has the correct understanding of any physical phenomenon. He will proudly proclaim this and ignore any authoritative citation you can give.

== Known accounts ==

{| class="wikitable"
|+ Known accounts
|-
! Platform !! Account !! Status
|-
| YouTube || [https://www.youtube.com/@angleofelevation8759 Angle of Elevation] || Active
|-
|}

== Examples of Bizarre Ideas ==

=== How Lenses Work ===
AoE is very expert at optics. Telescope lenses 'bend light down', apparently making distant object lower than they are. Theodolites therefore are unreliable instruments.
<div style="margin-bottom: -90px;">
[[File:aoe_fed_2589.png|1000px|Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589]]
</div>
''Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589''
=== Sunsets ===
Reading AoE's explanation for the sun setting below the horizon is particularly painful. Here's a transcript from his video 'Optical Occultation of the Sun' ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn0N5AJ8LUo]).

<blockquote>
"Listen up people, as a flat earther myself I've heard many people ask, 'how can the Sun set on a flat Earth?' Frankly, the common answer the received from flat earthers is rather too simple to allow for complete understanding so please allow me to expand your knowledge so that you can explain it to others. Once you get it, you're going to see the beauty of its simplicity."
<span style="display: block; text-align: right; font-style: italic;"></span>
</blockquote>
Take a moment to savour the sheer arrogance and 'confident wrongness' here.
<blockquote>
"Many flat earthers claim the horizon is the limit of perspective and that things converge at the horizon. They are only partially correct. Most things we see are 3D (they have three dimensions), those being height, width and depth. While they are all of equal importance, they do not operate the same. Hold a cube to your eye and identify all three of those dimensions. Notice the height and width are straight and perpendicular to each other, but not depth. It is at an angle; this is called optically rising. You know the bottom of that cube is flat in reality but you don't perceive it that way. Your brain interprets the incident angle of the reflected light received by your eye and perceives it as optically rising depth. This effect has a limit according to distance. The science that is known as the Rayleigh criteria which is the diffraction limit but really what is the limit of your depth perspective. We call it the horizon which is always at your eye height unless diffracted down by glasses..."
<span style="display: block; text-align: right; font-style: italic;"></span>
</blockquote>
You get the idea.
=== The Equator is a Meridian; caught in a lie ===

For some time now AoE has been saying that great circles of the spherical Earth, and specifically the Equator, are all meridians, a term reserved for lines of longitude. A simple factual error you might think and not one to double down on. But double down he does, and it's a hard one to understand.
This came up again on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589, where AoE duly came up with a citation that he said supported his view.

[[File:aoe_fed_2593.png|600px|Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589]]
<span style="display: block;font-style: italic;">The YouTube account of Pete-s6z8l has been blocked by the oh-so fragile egoed Nathan 'Slappy' Oakley. This and other comments by him, and any other comments in reply to him, have disappeared from Oakley's content.</span></br>
Note that his source is the search engine Google, and the lack of a closing quotation mark. He refused to clarify his source, or indeed to discuss the matter anymore. A little digging was needed.
Searching for his quote "The equatorial meridian is an imaginary line that circles the Earth at 0 degrees latitude, dividing it into the Northern and Southern ." yielded no exact, or even close results. However, replacing ''equatorial meridian'' with ''equator'' returns this in the second hit:
<blockquote>
...The Equator is an imaginary line that circles the Earth at 0 degrees latitude, dividing it into the Northern and Southern...

</blockquote>
This is Google's extract from a web page at [https://www.askfilo.com askfilo.com]. Had he bothered to look at the actual website and not just Google's extract, he'd have had the complete sentence, including the word ''hemispheres'' at the end.
It looks like AoE
* Googled 'equator',
* Found a short definition in the results,
* Didn't bother to look at the source website,
* Copied Google's extract,
* Substituted equator with Equatorial Meridian,
* Tried to pass it off as an authoritative definition.
AoE is always accusing people of 'making stuff up', which is clear projection.

#GottaLieToFlerf

== References ==
<references/>

[[Category:YouTube flerfs]]

Antonio Subirats

2026-08-15T09:43:07Z

Martin:

{{Infobox
| image = File:Antonio Subirats.png
| caption = Antonio Subirats
| location = Canada
| platform = [https://www.youtube.com/@antsub1681 YouTube]
}}

== Famous For ==
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQ47yP64SNQ Daytime Nighttime]

[[Patricia Steere]]s boyfriend.

Some history of this drama is documented here
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFQ2jrf6cR4 Antonio Subirats Tells All - As The Potato Turns S02E02 Season Finale] - TomFoolery channel Nov 18, 2016.

Here we have Antonio trans-revealing [[Patricia Steere]] - [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjifrQ2gSsg Antonio's Guide to Anatomy]

Antonio Subirats

2026-08-15T09:32:42Z

Martin:

{{Infobox
| image = File:Antonio Subirats.png
| caption = Antonio Subirats
| location = Canada
| platform = YouTube
}}

== Famous For ==
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQ47yP64SNQ Daytime Nighttime]

[[Patricia Steere]]s boyfriend.

Some history of this drama is documented here
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFQ2jrf6cR4 Antonio Subirats Tells All - As The Potato Turns S02E02 Season Finale] - TomFoolery channel Nov 18, 2016.

Here we have Antonio trans-revealing [[Patricia Steere]] - [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjifrQ2gSsg Antonio's Guide to Anatomy]

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-15T09:17:30Z

Martin: /* The Equator is a Meridian; caught in a lie */

{{Infobox
| image = File:Angle_of_Elevation.jpg
| caption = Current (09 August 2026) logo for Angle of Elevation YouTube channel
| location = Kazakhstan
| platform = YouTube
| papa = [[Nathan Oakley]]
}}

== Introduction ==
According to his profile, Angle of Elevation (AoE) joined YouTube on 12th August 2013. He has a few dozen videos.
He can be a prolific contributor on Nathan Oakley's comment section and live chats. However, he has spells where he goes AWOL, only to pop up again as if nothing happened. His disappearances could reasonably be explained by him complying with his medication regime, or by forced residence in a mental institution.

One thing that makes him stand out is his insistence that his strange version of physics and geometry is absolutely correct, while the textbooks and scientific literature are all wrong. He will demand proof/evidence while supplying none of his own and accuse people of "making stuff up" while clearly and demonstrably doing this himself.

When cornered, he has the typical flerf reactions; he'll deflect, change the subject, come up with an insult, or just go quiet. When forced, he may stay on topic for a while and then disappear.

Spelling and grammar too are typical of a flerf; dreadful.

Note, only he has the correct understanding of any physical phenomenon. He will proudly proclaim this and ignore any authoritative citation you can give.

== Known accounts ==

{| class="wikitable"
|+ Known accounts
|-
! Platform !! Account !! Status
|-
| YouTube || [https://www.youtube.com/@angleofelevation8759 Angle of Elevation] || Active
|-
|}

== Examples of Bizarre Ideas ==

=== How Lenses Work ===
AoE is very expert at optics. Telescope lenses 'bend light down', apparently making distant object lower than they are. Theodolites therefore are unreliable instruments.
<div style="margin-bottom: -90px;">
[[File:aoe_fed_2589.png|1000px|Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589]]
</div>
''Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589''
=== Sunsets ===
Reading AoE's explanation for the sun setting below the horizon is particularly painful. Here's a transcript from his video 'Optical Occultation of the Sun' ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn0N5AJ8LUo]).

<blockquote>
"Listen up people, as a flat earther myself I've heard many people ask, 'how can the Sun set on a flat Earth?' Frankly, the common answer the received from flat earthers is rather too simple to allow for complete understanding so please allow me to expand your knowledge so that you can explain it to others. Once you get it, you're going to see the beauty of its simplicity."
<span style="display: block; text-align: right; font-style: italic;"></span>
</blockquote>
Take a moment to savour the sheer arrogance and 'confident wrongness' here.
<blockquote>
"Many flat earthers claim the horizon is the limit of perspective and that things converge at the horizon. They are only partially correct. Most things we see are 3D (they have three dimensions), those being height, width and depth. While they are all of equal importance, they do not operate the same. Hold a cube to your eye and identify all three of those dimensions. Notice the height and width are straight and perpendicular to each other, but not depth. It is at an angle; this is called optically rising. You know the bottom of that cube is flat in reality but you don't perceive it that way. Your brain interprets the incident angle of the reflected light received by your eye and perceives it as optically rising depth. This effect has a limit according to distance. The science that is known as the Rayleigh criteria which is the diffraction limit but really what is the limit of your depth perspective. We call it the horizon which is always at your eye height unless diffracted down by glasses..."
<span style="display: block; text-align: right; font-style: italic;"></span>
</blockquote>
You get the idea.
=== The Equator is a Meridian; caught in a lie ===

For some time now AoE has been saying that great circles of the spherical Earth, and specifically the Equator, are all meridians, a term reserved for lines of longitude. A simple factual error you might think and not one to double down on. But double down he does, and it's a hard one to understand.
This came up again on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589, where AoE duly came up with a citation that he said supported his view.

[[File:aoe_fed_2593.png|600px|Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589]]
<span style="display: block;font-style: italic;">The YouTube account of Pete-s6z8l has been blocked by the oh-so fragile egoed Nathan 'Slappy' Oakley. This and other comments by him, and any other comments in reply to him, have disappeared from Oakley's content.</span></br>
Note that his source is the search engine Google, and the lack of a closing quotation mark. He refused to clarify his source, or indeed to discuss the matter anymore. A little digging was needed.
Searching for his quote "The equatorial meridian is an imaginary line that circles the Earth at 0 degrees latitude, dividing it into the Northern and Southern ." yielded no exact, or even close results. However, replacing ''equatorial meridian'' with ''equator'' returns this in the second hit:
<blockquote>
...The Equator is an imaginary line that circles the Earth at 0 degrees latitude, dividing it into the Northern and Southern...

</blockquote>
This is Google's extract from a web page at askfilo.com [https://www.askfilo.com]. Had he bothered to look at the actual website and not just Google's extract, he'd have had the complete sentence, including the word ''hemispheres'' at the end.
It looks like AoE
* Googled 'equator',
* Found a short definition in the results,
* Didn't bother to look at the source website,
* Copied Google's extract,
* Substituted equator with Equatorial Meridian,
* Tried to pass it off as an authoritative definition.
AoE is always accusing people of 'making stuff up', which is clear projection.

GottaLieToFlerf

== References ==
<references/>

[[Category:YouTube flerfs]]

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T15:56:25Z

Martin:

{{Infobox
| image = File:Angle_of_Elevation.jpg
| caption = Current (09 August 2026) logo for Angle of Elevation YouTube channel
| location = Kazakhstan
| platform = YouTube
| papa = [[Nathan Oakley]]
}}

== Introduction ==
According to his profile, Angle of Elevation (AoE) joined YouTube on 12th August 2013. He has a few dozen videos.
He can be a prolific contributor on Nathan Oakley's comment section and live chats. However, he has spells where he goes AWOL, only to pop up again as if nothing happened. His disappearances could reasonably be explained by him complying with his medication regime, or by forced residence in a mental institution.

One thing that makes him stand out is his insistence that his strange version of physics and geometry is absolutely correct, while the textbooks and scientific literature are all wrong. He will demand proof/evidence while supplying none of his own and accuse people of "making stuff up" while clearly and demonstrably doing this himself.

When cornered, he has the typical flerf reactions; he'll deflect, change the subject, come up with an insult, or just go quiet. When forced, he may stay on topic for a while and then disappear.

Spelling and grammar too are typical of a flerf; dreadful.

Note, only he has the correct understanding of any physical phenomenon. He will proudly proclaim this and ignore any authoritative citation you can give.

== Known accounts ==

{| class="wikitable"
|+ Known accounts
|-
! Platform !! Account !! Status
|-
| YouTube || [https://www.youtube.com/@angleofelevation8759 Angle of Elevation] || Active
|-
|}

== Examples of Bizarre Ideas ==

=== How Lenses Work ===
AoE is very expert at optics. Telescope lenses 'bend light down', apparently making distant object lower than they are. Theodolites therefore are unreliable instruments.
<div style="margin-bottom: -90px;">
[[File:aoe_fed_2589.png|1000px|Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589]]
</div>
''Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589''
=== Sunsets ===
Reading AoE's explanation for the sun setting below the horizon is particularly painful. Here's a transcript from his video 'Optical Occultation of the Sun' ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn0N5AJ8LUo]).

<blockquote>
"Listen up people, as a flat earther myself I've heard many people ask, 'how can the Sun set on a flat Earth?' Frankly, the common answer the received from flat earthers is rather too simple to allow for complete understanding so please allow me to expand your knowledge so that you can explain it to others. Once you get it, you're going to see the beauty of its simplicity."
<span style="display: block; text-align: right; font-style: italic;"></span>
</blockquote>
Take a moment to savour the sheer arrogance and 'confident wrongness' here.
<blockquote>
"Many flat earthers claim the horizon is the limit of perspective and that things converge at the horizon. They are only partially correct. Most things we see are 3D (they have three dimensions), those being height, width and depth. While they are all of equal importance, they do not operate the same. Hold a cube to your eye and identify all three of those dimensions. Notice the height and width are straight and perpendicular to each other, but not depth. It is at an angle; this is called optically rising. You know the bottom of that cube is flat in reality but you don't perceive it that way. Your brain interprets the incident angle of the reflected light received by your eye and perceives it as optically rising depth. This effect has a limit according to distance. The science that is known as the Rayleigh criteria which is the diffraction limit but really what is the limit of your depth perspective. We call it the horizon which is always at your eye height unless diffracted down by glasses..."
<span style="display: block; text-align: right; font-style: italic;"></span>
</blockquote>
You get the idea.
=== The Equator is a Meridian; caught in a lie ===

For some time now AoE has been saying that great circles of the spherical Earth, and specifically the Equator, are all meridians, a term reserved for lines of longitude. A simple factual error you might think and not one to double down on. But double down he does, and it's a hard one to understand.
This came up again on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589, where AoE duly came up with a citation that he said supported his view.

[[File:aoe_fed_2593.png|600px|Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589]]

Note that his source is the search engine Google, and the lack of a closing quotation mark. He refused to clarify his source, or indeed to discuss the matter anymore. A little digging was needed.
Searching for his quote "The equatorial meridian is an imaginary line that circles the Earth at 0 degrees latitude, dividing it into the Northern and Southern ." yielded no exact, or even close results. However, replacing ''equatorial meridian'' with ''equator'' returns this in the second hit:
<blockquote>
...The Equator is an imaginary line that circles the Earth at 0 degrees latitude, dividing it into the Northern and Southern...
<span style="display: block; text-align: right; font-style: italic;"></span>
</blockquote>
This is Google's extract from a web page at askfilo.com [https://www.askfilo.com]. Had he bothered to look at the actual website and not just Google's extract, he'd have had the complete sentence, including the word ''hemispheres'' at the end.
It looks like AoE
* Googled 'equator',
* Found a short definition in the results,
* Didn't bother to look at the source website,
* Copied Google's extract,
* Substituted equator with Equatorial Meridian,
* Tried to pass it off as an authoritative definition.
AoE is always accusing people of 'making stuff up', which is clear projection.

GottaLieToFlerf

== References ==
<references/>

[[Category:YouTube flerfs]]

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T15:48:23Z

Martin:

{{Infobox
| image = File:Angle_of_Elevation.jpg
| caption = Current (09 August 2026) logo for Angle of Elevation YouTube channel
| location = Kazakhstan
| platform = YouTube
| papa = [[Nathan Oakley]]
}}

== Introduction ==
According to his profile, Angle of Elevation (AoE) joined YouTube on 12th August 2013. He has a few dozen videos.
He can be a prolific contributor on Nathan Oakley's comment section and live chats. However, he has spells where he goes AWOL, only to pop up again as if nothing happened. His disappearances could reasonably be explained by him complying with his medication regime, or by forced residence in a mental institution.

One thing that makes him stand out is his insistence that his strange version of physics and geometry is absolutely correct, while the textbooks and scientific literature are all wrong. He will demand proof/evidence while supplying none of his own and accuse people of "making stuff up" while clearly and demonstrably doing this himself.

When cornered, he has the typical flerf reactions; he'll deflect, change the subject, come up with an insult, or just go quiet. When forced, he may stay on topic for a while and then disappear.

Spelling and grammar too are typical of a flerf; dreadful.

Note, only he has the correct understanding of any physical phenomenon. He will proudly proclaim this and ignore any authoritative citation you can give.

== Known accounts ==

{| class="wikitable"
|+ Known accounts
|-
! Platform !! Account !! Status
|-
| YouTube || [https://www.youtube.com/@angleofelevation8759 Angle of Elevation] || Active
|-
|}

== Examples of Bizarre Ideas ==

=== How Lenses Work ===
AoE is very expert at optics. Telescope lenses 'bend light down', apparently making distant object lower than they are. Theodolites therefore are unreliable instruments.
<div style="margin-bottom: -90px;">
[[File:aoe_fed_2589.png|1000px|Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589]]
</div>
''Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589''
=== Sunsets ===
Reading AoE's explanation for the sun setting below the horizon is particularly painful. Here's a transcript from his video 'Optical Occultation of the Sun' ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn0N5AJ8LUo]).

<blockquote>
"Listen up people, as a flat earther myself I've heard many people ask, 'how can the Sun set on a flat Earth?' Frankly, the common answer the received from flat earthers is rather too simple to allow for complete understanding so please allow me to expand your knowledge so that you can explain it to others. Once you get it, you're going to see the beauty of its simplicity."
<span style="display: block; text-align: right; font-style: italic;"></span>
</blockquote>
Take a moment to savour the sheer arrogance and 'confident wrongness' here.
<blockquote>
"Many flat earthers claim the horizon is the limit of perspective and that things converge at the horizon. They are only partially correct. Most things we see are 3D (they have three dimensions), those being height, width and depth. While they are all of equal importance, they do not operate the same. Hold a cube to your eye and identify all three of those dimensions. Notice the height and width are straight and perpendicular to each other, but not depth. It is at an angle; this is called optically rising. You know the bottom of that cube is flat in reality but you don't perceive it that way. Your brain interprets the incident angle of the reflected light received by your eye and perceives it as optically rising depth. This effect has a limit according to distance. The science that is known as the Rayleigh criteria which is the diffraction limit but really what is the limit of your depth perspective. We call it the horizon which is always at your eye height unless diffracted down by glasses..."
<span style="display: block; text-align: right; font-style: italic;"></span>
</blockquote>
You get the idea.
=== The Equator is a Meridian; caught in a lie ===

For some time now AoE has been saying that great circles of the spherical Earth, and specifically the Equator, are all meridians, a term reserved for lines of longitude. A simple factual error you might think and not one to double down on. But double down he does, and it's a hard one to understand.
This came up again on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589, where AoE duly came up with a citation that he said supported his view.

[[File:aoe_fed_2593.png|600px|Angle of Elevation comments on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589]]

Note that his source is the search engine Google, and the lack of a closing quotation mark. He refused to clarify his source, or indeed to discuss the matter anymore. A little digging was needed.
Searching for his quote "The equatorial meridian is an imaginary line that circles the Earth at 0 degrees latitude, dividing it into the Northern and Southern ." yielded no exact, or even close results. However, replacing ''equatorial meridian'' with ''equator'' returns this in the second hit:
<blockquote>
...The Equator is an imaginary line that circles the Earth at 0 degrees latitude, dividing it into the Northern and Southern...
<span style="display: block; text-align: right; font-style: italic;"></span>
</blockquote>
This is Google's extract from a web page at askfilo.com. Had he bothered to look at the actual website and not just Google's extract, he'd have had the complete sentence, including the word ''hemispheres'' at the end.
It looks like AoE
* Googled 'equator',
* Found a short definition in the results,
* Didn't bother to look at the source website,
* Copied Google's extract,
* Substituted equator with Equatorial Meridian,
* Tried to pass it off as an authoritative definition.
AoE is always accusing people of 'making stuff up', which is clear projection.

GottaLieToFlerf

[[Category:YouTube flerfs]]

File:Aoe fed 2593.png

2026-08-09T15:07:04Z

Martin: Angle of Elevation comment on Nathan Oakley's FED 2593

== Summary ==
Angle of Elevation comment on Nathan Oakley's FED 2593

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T14:55:15Z

Martin:

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T14:50:41Z

Martin:

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T14:49:34Z

Martin:

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T14:43:18Z

Martin:

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T14:24:46Z

Martin:

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T13:59:07Z

Martin:

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T13:55:42Z

Martin:

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T13:39:02Z

Martin:

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T13:29:08Z

Martin:

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T13:19:37Z

Martin:

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T13:10:16Z

Martin:

File:Aoe fed 2582.png

2026-08-09T13:06:34Z

Martin: Angle of Elevation on Nathan Oakley's FED 2582

== Summary ==
Angle of Elevation on Nathan Oakley's FED 2582

File:Aoe fed 2589.png

2026-08-09T13:05:36Z

Martin: Comments from Angle of Elevation on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589

== Summary ==
Comments from Angle of Elevation on Nathan Oakley's FED 2589

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T13:03:44Z

Martin:

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T13:00:25Z

Martin:

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T11:42:12Z

Martin:

{{Infobox
| image = File:Angle_of_Elevation.jpg
| caption = Current (09 August 2026) logo for Angle of Elevation YouTube channel
| location = Kazakhstan
| platform = YouTube
| papa = [[Nathan Oakley]]
}}

== Known accounts ==

{| class="wikitable"
|+ Known accounts
|-
! Platform !! Account !! Status
|-
| YouTube || [https://www.youtube.com/@angleofelevation8759 Angle of Elevation] || Active
|-
|}

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T11:37:26Z

Martin:

{{Infobox
| image = File:Angle_of_Elevation.jpg
| caption = Current (09 August 2026) logo for Angle of Elevation YouTube channel
| location = Kazakhstan
| platform = YouTube
| papa = [[Nathan Oakley]]
}}

== Known accounts ==

{| class="wikitable"
|+ Known accounts
|-
! Platform !! Account !! Status
|-
| YouTube || [account_link www.youtube.com/@angleofelevation8759] || Active
|-
|}

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T11:24:10Z

Martin:

Angle of Elevation

2026-08-09T11:20:57Z

Martin: Created page with "{{Infobox | image = File:Angle_of_Elevation.jpg | caption = Current (09 August 2026) logo for Angle of Elevation YouTube channel, www.youtube.com/@angleofelevation8759 | location = Kazakhstan | platform = YouTube | papa = Nathan Oakley }}"

{{Infobox
| image = File:Angle_of_Elevation.jpg
| caption = Current (09 August 2026) logo for Angle of Elevation YouTube channel, www.youtube.com/@angleofelevation8759
| location = Kazakhstan
| platform = YouTube
| papa = [[Nathan Oakley]]
}}

File:Angle of Elevation.jpg

2026-08-09T11:07:21Z

Martin: Current (09 August 2026) logo for Angle of Elevation YouTube channel, www.youtube.com/@angleofelevation8759

== Summary ==
Current (09 August 2026) logo for Angle of Elevation YouTube channel, www.youtube.com/@angleofelevation8759