Flerf Wiki - User contributions [en]

Restricted

2026-09-27T23:48:42Z

Flawrock:

The GRAVITY FREE CALCS HAVE BEEN UPDATED The calculator no longer derives its pressure gradient from previous or any g type of hydrostatic equation. Pressure is taken from raw measurements, medium density is independently recalculated from local pressure and temperature, object density is measured and neither G nor g appears in the calculation engine. .. so you are no longer focused on being accurate . It’s obsession over a person for a disagreement. Sick behavior .. you realizing you are proving your model isn’t science right ??? Are you okay Oscar . Do you want a page about you .. cause that’s the next move .. please keep it up

Hi, I'm a glober & I have dogma, and it's bad. So bad I stalk pages of people I don't even know and made a page because I obviously need to PROTECT MY MODEL. Why does it need this much protection if it was genuinely falsifiable? Because it's not. I take it right to the heart, and I'll gladly do it again because I have dogma. Science is encouraged to be challenged, but not this model, because by repeatedly updating a profile I don't know about the person, it's proving it's pseudoscience every time I loop back around and post misinformation about someone I've never met. You see how sick that is. I write about people I don't even know their first name because I'm a glober & my model is unfalsifiable, meaning I'm so blinded I think there's no possible way the photos can be faked. Even though “it’s photoshop but it has to be” I don't care about that. Space is the place I've never been to, but I imagine it so hard it's like I've been there. I depend on strawman arguments & being a victim because my dogma says so.

And yes, I'll do it again. Again & again until my unfalsifiable model remains unfalsifiable.

It's literally dogma. If my model were actual science, it could be genuinely challenged & encouraged to be, but of course it can't be challenged. I HAVE TO protect it like a guard dog, because it's dogma. That's what dogma does: it ignores logic and lets raw emotion run the entire framework because it's a fragile pseudoscience.

I promise you, I'll do it again. I'll watch him & race back over here to change everything back just like I always do, proving the entire point. I have to protect the model.

UPDATE…..The calculation architecture has been completely UPDATED and decoupled from hydrostatics, buoyancy, and density metrics. The model no longer relies on those calculations at all, yet it CONTINUES to output the exact same baseline acceleration results. THE CALCULATOR IS MORE USER FRIENDLY & stronger than ever now. As a glober I will have to pretend that's not the case because that's my only line of defense. I'll say something like he hasn't shown it yet. That's because I can't find his page to ask.

This completely shatters this page's recycled critiques. They claim electrostatics is 'not strong enough,' even though it is a trillion times stronger than gravity. That's an admission that makes their fiat force a smart dust by their own metrics. Gravity remains entirely unisolated and unshieldable, whereas electrostatic forces can be directly manipulated and tested in real world environments.

Because gravity cannot be independently isolated, only ASSUMED, it operates as an unfalsifiable placeholder, chalkboard math, & the name isn't even restricted. That's how slow they are, still clinging on to the past.

WHAT'S NEXT LOL? Is more cope & repeated strawman because I've been triggered to the point that a wiki page is my new safe haven lmao.

Calculations 100% don't need gravity & it's more automated & user friendly than before. I can't latch on to the calculations, but I will because I have nothing left to cope with.

I have to strawman to make my point. Because I can't use actual points. I rely on strawman arguments btw.

Restricted

2026-09-27T23:47:56Z

Flawrock:

The GRAVITY FREE CALCS HAVE BEEN UPDATED The calculator no longer derives its pressure gradient from previous or any g type of hydrostatic equation. Pressure is taken from raw measurements, medium density is independently recalculated from local pressure and temperature, object density is measured or derived from mass and volume, and neither G nor g appears in the calculation engine. .. so you are no longer focused on being accurate . It’s obsession over a person for a disagreement. Sick behavior .. you realizing you are proving your model isn’t science right ??? Are you okay Oscar . Do you want a page about you .. cause that’s the next move .. please keep it up

Hi, I'm a glober & I have dogma, and it's bad. So bad I stalk pages of people I don't even know and made a page because I obviously need to PROTECT MY MODEL. Why does it need this much protection if it was genuinely falsifiable? Because it's not. I take it right to the heart, and I'll gladly do it again because I have dogma. Science is encouraged to be challenged, but not this model, because by repeatedly updating a profile I don't know about the person, it's proving it's pseudoscience every time I loop back around and post misinformation about someone I've never met. You see how sick that is. I write about people I don't even know their first name because I'm a glober & my model is unfalsifiable, meaning I'm so blinded I think there's no possible way the photos can be faked. Even though “it’s photoshop but it has to be” I don't care about that. Space is the place I've never been to, but I imagine it so hard it's like I've been there. I depend on strawman arguments & being a victim because my dogma says so.

And yes, I'll do it again. Again & again until my unfalsifiable model remains unfalsifiable.

It's literally dogma. If my model were actual science, it could be genuinely challenged & encouraged to be, but of course it can't be challenged. I HAVE TO protect it like a guard dog, because it's dogma. That's what dogma does: it ignores logic and lets raw emotion run the entire framework because it's a fragile pseudoscience.

I promise you, I'll do it again. I'll watch him & race back over here to change everything back just like I always do, proving the entire point. I have to protect the model.

UPDATE…..The calculation architecture has been completely UPDATED and decoupled from hydrostatics, buoyancy, and density metrics. The model no longer relies on those calculations at all, yet it CONTINUES to output the exact same baseline acceleration results. THE CALCULATOR IS MORE USER FRIENDLY & stronger than ever now. As a glober I will have to pretend that's not the case because that's my only line of defense. I'll say something like he hasn't shown it yet. That's because I can't find his page to ask.

This completely shatters this page's recycled critiques. They claim electrostatics is 'not strong enough,' even though it is a trillion times stronger than gravity. That's an admission that makes their fiat force a smart dust by their own metrics. Gravity remains entirely unisolated and unshieldable, whereas electrostatic forces can be directly manipulated and tested in real world environments.

Because gravity cannot be independently isolated, only ASSUMED, it operates as an unfalsifiable placeholder, chalkboard math, & the name isn't even restricted. That's how slow they are, still clinging on to the past.

WHAT'S NEXT LOL? Is more cope & repeated strawman because I've been triggered to the point that a wiki page is my new safe haven lmao.

Calculations 100% don't need gravity & it's more automated & user friendly than before. I can't latch on to the calculations, but I will because I have nothing left to cope with.

I have to strawman to make my point. Because I can't use actual points. I rely on strawman arguments btw.

Restricted

2026-09-27T23:37:47Z

Flawrock:

The GRAVITY FREE CALCS HAVE BEEN UPDATED The calculator no longer derives its pressure gradient from gravity or a g type of hydrostatic equation. Pressure is taken from raw measurements, medium density is independently recalculated from local pressure and temperature, object density is measured or derived from mass and volume, and neither G nor g appears in the calculation engine. .. so you are no longer focused on being accurate . It’s obsession over a person for a disagreement. Sick behavior .. you realizing you are proving your model isn’t science right ??? Are you okay Oscar . Do you want a page about you .. cause that’s the next move .. please keep it up

Hi, I'm a glober & I have dogma, and it's bad. So bad I stalk pages of people I don't even know and made a page because I obviously need to PROTECT MY MODEL. Why does it need this much protection if it was genuinely falsifiable? Because it's not. I take it right to the heart, and I'll gladly do it again because I have dogma. Science is encouraged to be challenged, but not this model, because by repeatedly updating a profile I don't know about the person, it's proving it's pseudoscience every time I loop back around and post misinformation about someone I've never met. You see how sick that is. I write about people I don't even know their first name because I'm a glober & my model is unfalsifiable, meaning I'm so blinded I think there's no possible way the photos can be faked. Even though “it’s photoshop but it has to be” I don't care about that. Space is the place I've never been to, but I imagine it so hard it's like I've been there. I depend on strawman arguments & being a victim because my dogma says so.

And yes, I'll do it again. Again & again until my unfalsifiable model remains unfalsifiable.

It's literally dogma. If my model were actual science, it could be genuinely challenged & encouraged to be, but of course it can't be challenged. I HAVE TO protect it like a guard dog, because it's dogma. That's what dogma does: it ignores logic and lets raw emotion run the entire framework because it's a fragile pseudoscience.

I promise you, I'll do it again. I'll watch him & race back over here to change everything back just like I always do, proving the entire point. I have to protect the model.

UPDATE…..The calculation architecture has been completely UPDATED and decoupled from hydrostatics, buoyancy, and density metrics. The model no longer relies on those calculations at all, yet it CONTINUES to output the exact same baseline acceleration results. THE CALCULATOR IS MORE USER FRIENDLY & stronger than ever now. As a glober I will have to pretend that's not the case because that's my only line of defense. I'll say something like he hasn't shown it yet. That's because I can't find his page to ask.

This completely shatters this page's recycled critiques. They claim electrostatics is 'not strong enough,' even though it is a trillion times stronger than gravity. That's an admission that makes their fiat force a smart dust by their own metrics. Gravity remains entirely unisolated and unshieldable, whereas electrostatic forces can be directly manipulated and tested in real world environments.

Because gravity cannot be independently isolated, only ASSUMED, it operates as an unfalsifiable placeholder, chalkboard math, & the name isn't even restricted. That's how slow they are, still clinging on to the past.

WHAT'S NEXT LOL? Is more cope & repeated strawman because I've been triggered to the point that a wiki page is my new safe haven lmao.

Calculations 100% don't need gravity & it's more automated & user friendly than before. I can't latch on to the calculations, but I will because I have nothing left to cope with.

I have to strawman to make my point. Because I can't use actual points. I rely on strawman arguments btw.

Restricted

2026-09-27T23:37:11Z

Flawrock:

The GRAVITY FREE CALCS HAVE BEEN UPDATED The calculator no longer derives its pressure gradient from gravity or a g-based hydrostatic equation. Pressure is taken from raw measurements, medium density is independently recalculated from local pressure and temperature, object density is measured or derived from mass and volume, and neither G nor g appears in the calculation engine. .. so you are no longer focused on being accurate . It’s obsession over a person for a disagreement. Sick behavior .. you realizing you are proving your model isn’t science right ??? Are you okay Oscar . Do you want a page about you .. cause that’s the next move .. please keep it up

Hi, I'm a glober & I have dogma, and it's bad. So bad I stalk pages of people I don't even know and made a page because I obviously need to PROTECT MY MODEL. Why does it need this much protection if it was genuinely falsifiable? Because it's not. I take it right to the heart, and I'll gladly do it again because I have dogma. Science is encouraged to be challenged, but not this model, because by repeatedly updating a profile I don't know about the person, it's proving it's pseudoscience every time I loop back around and post misinformation about someone I've never met. You see how sick that is. I write about people I don't even know their first name because I'm a glober & my model is unfalsifiable, meaning I'm so blinded I think there's no possible way the photos can be faked. Even though “it’s photoshop but it has to be” I don't care about that. Space is the place I've never been to, but I imagine it so hard it's like I've been there. I depend on strawman arguments & being a victim because my dogma says so.

And yes, I'll do it again. Again & again until my unfalsifiable model remains unfalsifiable.

It's literally dogma. If my model were actual science, it could be genuinely challenged & encouraged to be, but of course it can't be challenged. I HAVE TO protect it like a guard dog, because it's dogma. That's what dogma does: it ignores logic and lets raw emotion run the entire framework because it's a fragile pseudoscience.

I promise you, I'll do it again. I'll watch him & race back over here to change everything back just like I always do, proving the entire point. I have to protect the model.

UPDATE…..The calculation architecture has been completely UPDATED and decoupled from hydrostatics, buoyancy, and density metrics. The model no longer relies on those calculations at all, yet it CONTINUES to output the exact same baseline acceleration results. THE CALCULATOR IS MORE USER FRIENDLY & stronger than ever now. As a glober I will have to pretend that's not the case because that's my only line of defense. I'll say something like he hasn't shown it yet. That's because I can't find his page to ask.

This completely shatters this page's recycled critiques. They claim electrostatics is 'not strong enough,' even though it is a trillion times stronger than gravity. That's an admission that makes their fiat force a smart dust by their own metrics. Gravity remains entirely unisolated and unshieldable, whereas electrostatic forces can be directly manipulated and tested in real world environments.

Because gravity cannot be independently isolated, only ASSUMED, it operates as an unfalsifiable placeholder, chalkboard math, & the name isn't even restricted. That's how slow they are, still clinging on to the past.

WHAT'S NEXT LOL? Is more cope & repeated strawman because I've been triggered to the point that a wiki page is my new safe haven lmao.

Calculations 100% don't need gravity & it's more automated & user friendly than before. I can't latch on to the calculations, but I will because I have nothing left to cope with.

I have to strawman to make my point. Because I can't use actual points. I rely on strawman arguments btw.

Restricted

2026-09-27T23:29:39Z

Flawrock:

The GRAVITY FREE CALCS HAVE BEEN UPDATED .. so you are no longer focused on being accurate . It’s obsession over a person for a disagreement. Sick behavior .. you realizing you are proving your model isn’t science right ??? Are you okay Oscar . Do you want a page about you .. cause that’s the next move .. please keep it up

Hi, I'm a glober & I have dogma, and it's bad. So bad I stalk pages of people I don't even know and made a page because I obviously need to PROTECT MY MODEL. Why does it need this much protection if it was genuinely falsifiable? Because it's not. I take it right to the heart, and I'll gladly do it again because I have dogma. Science is encouraged to be challenged, but not this model, because by repeatedly updating a profile I don't know about the person, it's proving it's pseudoscience every time I loop back around and post misinformation about someone I've never met. You see how sick that is. I write about people I don't even know their first name because I'm a glober & my model is unfalsifiable, meaning I'm so blinded I think there's no possible way the photos can be faked. Even though “it’s photoshop but it has to be” I don't care about that. Space is the place I've never been to, but I imagine it so hard it's like I've been there. I depend on strawman arguments & being a victim because my dogma says so.

And yes, I'll do it again. Again & again until my unfalsifiable model remains unfalsifiable.

It's literally dogma. If my model were actual science, it could be genuinely challenged & encouraged to be, but of course it can't be challenged. I HAVE TO protect it like a guard dog, because it's dogma. That's what dogma does: it ignores logic and lets raw emotion run the entire framework because it's a fragile pseudoscience.

I promise you, I'll do it again. I'll watch him & race back over here to change everything back just like I always do, proving the entire point. I have to protect the model.

UPDATE…..The calculation architecture has been completely UPDATED and decoupled from hydrostatics, buoyancy, and density metrics. The model no longer relies on those calculations at all, yet it CONTINUES to output the exact same baseline acceleration results. THE CALCULATOR IS MORE USER FRIENDLY & stronger than ever now. As a glober I will have to pretend that's not the case because that's my only line of defense. I'll say something like he hasn't shown it yet. That's because I can't find his page to ask.

This completely shatters this page's recycled critiques. They claim electrostatics is 'not strong enough,' even though it is a trillion times stronger than gravity. That's an admission that makes their fiat force a smart dust by their own metrics. Gravity remains entirely unisolated and unshieldable, whereas electrostatic forces can be directly manipulated and tested in real world environments.

Because gravity cannot be independently isolated, only ASSUMED, it operates as an unfalsifiable placeholder, chalkboard math, & the name isn't even restricted. That's how slow they are, still clinging on to the past.

WHAT'S NEXT LOL? Is more cope & repeated strawman because I've been triggered to the point that a wiki page is my new safe haven lmao.

Calculations 100% don't need gravity & it's more automated & user friendly than before. I can't latch on to the calculations, but I will because I have nothing left to cope with.

I have to strawman to make my point. Because I can't use actual points. I rely on strawman arguments btw.

User talk:Washcarso

2026-09-27T23:28:50Z

Flawrock:

I think There’s something wrong with you , the gravity free calculator doesn’t have the same calculations but yet you’re still going off the past .. why ? Because you’re obsesse

User:Washcarso

2026-09-27T23:27:17Z

Flawrock:

My name is Oscar , & I dont Care about anything factual anymore. The gravity free calculator does not rely on buoyancy & density anymore but I dont Care because Im not here for the truth

It’s not that gravity can’t be shielded or isolated from gravity. It’s that gravity can’t be isolated AT ALL!!!! Get that through your thick skull. GRAVITY HAS ONLY BEEN ASSUMED. It’s never been unequivocally isolated in a lab. ELECTROSTATIC HAS BEEN. Deleted everything & assuming what’s left is not ISOLATION. What happens when I create a new force on top of gravity & don’t have to have it isolated to prove itself? YOU’LL SAY IT’S FAKE. But that’s exactly the special pleading gravity has. ALL THE EXPERIMENTS ASSUME GRAVITY. Never proved. YOU CAN’T GRASP THAT CONCEPT because you don’t understand physics. SIMPLE AS THAT. It’s never been isolated effectively. Stop strawmanning because you can’t take accountability. It’s never been UNDOUBTEDLY ISOLATED. Electrostatic has. YOU STILL DON’T UNDERSTAND ISOLATION. Instead you should REALLY STUDY it. Shielding is one FORM of isolation. All a force needs is ONE FORM. GRAVITY HAS NO FORMS OF ISOLATION. ZERO. You cope with saying gravity is attached to mass. It shouldn’t have to be if it’s a real force. It’s a fiat force, meaning it’s backed by FAITH. That’s your inability to take accountability. So you project your insecurity & call me things because you can’t isolate gravity or manipulate it in a lab. All your model has is EXCUSES WHY SOMETHING CAN’T HAPPEN. More excuses. You wrote a whole page about me because you’re insecure. How about you go build something on your threads page with your 4 followers instead of basing your life on someone else. Damn. You are a hypocrite. Made a whole page about me but say I talk down to people. Are you any better? What if I made a page about you? Hypocrites are the lowest forms of humans because their ideology is based on being against the same exact person they are. No wonder why you think you live on a spinning ball. Spinning ball goes well with spinning logic.

Talk:Restricted

2026-09-27T23:24:26Z

Flawrock:

UPDATE…..The calculation architecture has been completely UPDATED and decoupled from hydrostatics, buoyancy, and density metrics. The model no longer relies on those calculations at all, yet it CONTINUES to output the exact same baseline acceleration results. THE CALCULATOR IS MORE USER FRIENDLY & stronger than ever now. As a glober I will have to pretend that's not the case because that's my only line of defense. I'll say something like he hasn't shown it yet. That's because I can't find his page to ask.

Restricted

2026-09-27T23:23:00Z

Flawrock:

The GRAVITY FREE CALCS HAVE BEEN UPDATED .. so you are no longer focused on being accurate . It’s obsession over a person for a disagreement. Sick behavior .. you realizing you are proving your model isn’t science right ??? Are you okay Oscar . Do you want a page about you .. cause that’s the next movie

Hi, I'm a glober & I have dogma, and it's bad. So bad I stalk pages of people I don't even know and made a page because I obviously need to PROTECT MY MODEL. Why does it need this much protection if it was genuinely falsifiable? Because it's not. I take it right to the heart, and I'll gladly do it again because I have dogma. Science is encouraged to be challenged, but not this model, because by repeatedly updating a profile I don't know about the person, it's proving it's pseudoscience every time I loop back around and post misinformation about someone I've never met. You see how sick that is. I write about people I don't even know their first name because I'm a glober & my model is unfalsifiable, meaning I'm so blinded I think there's no possible way the photos can be faked. Even though “it’s photoshop but it has to be” I don't care about that. Space is the place I've never been to, but I imagine it so hard it's like I've been there. I depend on strawman arguments & being a victim because my dogma says so.

And yes, I'll do it again. Again & again until my unfalsifiable model remains unfalsifiable.

It's literally dogma. If my model were actual science, it could be genuinely challenged & encouraged to be, but of course it can't be challenged. I HAVE TO protect it like a guard dog, because it's dogma. That's what dogma does: it ignores logic and lets raw emotion run the entire framework because it's a fragile pseudoscience.

I promise you, I'll do it again. I'll watch him & race back over here to change everything back just like I always do, proving the entire point. I have to protect the model.

UPDATE…..The calculation architecture has been completely UPDATED and decoupled from hydrostatics, buoyancy, and density metrics. The model no longer relies on those calculations at all, yet it CONTINUES to output the exact same baseline acceleration results. THE CALCULATOR IS MORE USER FRIENDLY & stronger than ever now. As a glober I will have to pretend that's not the case because that's my only line of defense. I'll say something like he hasn't shown it yet. That's because I can't find his page to ask.

This completely shatters this page's recycled critiques. They claim electrostatics is 'not strong enough,' even though it is a trillion times stronger than gravity. That's an admission that makes their fiat force a smart dust by their own metrics. Gravity remains entirely unisolated and unshieldable, whereas electrostatic forces can be directly manipulated and tested in real world environments.

Because gravity cannot be independently isolated, only ASSUMED, it operates as an unfalsifiable placeholder, chalkboard math, & the name isn't even restricted. That's how slow they are, still clinging on to the past.

WHAT'S NEXT LOL? Is more cope & repeated strawman because I've been triggered to the point that a wiki page is my new safe haven lmao.

Calculations 100% don't need gravity & it's more automated & user friendly than before. I can't latch on to the calculations, but I will because I have nothing left to cope with.

I have to strawman to make my point. Because I can't use actual points. I rely on strawman arguments btw.