Flerf Wiki - User contributions [en]

User talk:Washcarso

2026-09-28T13:28:31Z

Backget233: /* karl popper would be turning in his grave */ new section

Nothing what you’re doing is rooted in science, it’s pure fan fiction

This is pure dogma . You don’t like the same treatment you do to others . Then stop being a hypocrite. Fan fiction lol it’s amazing Oscar . You would rather write about someone you don’t know . Proving that this model is no longer science. You are protecting a religion

== dogma not science ==

This is pure dogma, not science. You are creating an account about someone you don't know. The account name is not even accurate. The information is not even accurate. It's a strawman argument you created against the attacking body, and then now you're complaining that someone is removing what you wrote as a strawman against them.

How hypocritical, ironic, and brainwashed you have to be to accept the standard that you don't even accept for yourself. It is amazing how people function to protect a model while proving it's unfalsifiable while thinking it's still science.

It's an amazing closed loop that you created that you can't even understand and have the cognitive ability to process.

== karl popper would be turning in his grave ==

Everything that you're doing is rooted in dogma. Nothing about what you're doing is science. Science is encouraged to be challenged. You're proving otherwise. You're saying this is what happens when you try to challenge the model. Then it's a religion at this point. You're proving that.

But my question is, when will you have the cognitive ability to realize that what you're doing is no longer science? Karl Popper would be turning in his grave to understand the level of unfalsifiability that has arrived in the model merely because of space pictures and government trust.

User talk:Washcarso

2026-09-28T13:26:20Z

Backget233: /* dogma not science */ new section

User talk:Washcarso

2026-09-28T13:24:44Z

Backget233:

User talk:Washcarso

2026-09-28T13:24:20Z

Backget233:

User talk:Washcarso

2026-09-28T13:22:03Z

Backget233: Replaced content with "What about what you’re doing is rooted in science , I’ll answer, NOTHING !! Dogma captain here . You don’t like the same treatment you do to others . Then stop being a hypocrite. Fan fiction lol it’s amazing Oscar . You would rather write about someone you don’t know . Proving that this model is no longer science. You are protecting a religion"

What about what you’re doing is rooted in science , I’ll answer, NOTHING !!

Dogma captain here . You don’t like the same treatment you do to others . Then stop being a hypocrite. Fan fiction lol it’s amazing Oscar . You would rather write about someone you don’t know . Proving that this model is no longer science. You are protecting a religion

User:Washcarso

2026-09-28T13:19:10Z

Backget233:

I edit Flerfipedia & write fan fiction because Im that obsessed . The gravity free calcs are updated but you won’t accept it because you haven’t seen it, ironic because that’s the same standard I have For gravity not being isolated but you don’t have . Just brain rot obsession at this point.

The calcs no longer have the same equations but I guess It’s more about slander then about being accurate

Talk:Restricted

2026-09-28T13:16:14Z

Backget233:

This is the absolute peak of toxic internet irony. Oscar & friend sets up a dedicated wiki page to compile a dossier on an anonymous online user tracking their handles, platform history, and arguments and then turns around and acts like they are the victim of "vandalism" because the person tries to delete or clear out a page written entirely about them.

The name isn’t even restricted anymore . Pure brain rot over a model

“Good faith” is ironic coming people who slander someone with strawman arguments The name doesn’t even have restricted in it, that’s how much inaccurate this page is lol FAN FICTION . Such a fixation . Any model that needs this much protection was never science . Keep proving me right , if it was science the model would be ENCOURAGED for falsification

This is pure fan fiction behavior. Not only are you saying "good faith," good faith is not writing about somebody, putting up a profile, strawmanning their whole argument, putting the account... the account's not even under the right name. The name no longer even has "restricted" in it. This is fan fiction behavior. This is a fan fiction account. This is fan fiction obsession. Like, if your model needs this much protection, you're proving in real time it's not a science.

When does science need this much protection? No, only an unfalsifiable model needs this much protection. And you're getting upset that someone is vandalizing a page, slandering and strawmanning. It's ironic. This is internet brain rot. You haven't met the person. You don't even know the person's name. But yet you think you know, you're so comfortable writing about a person you don't even know because they have opposing views.

Restricted

2026-09-28T13:15:05Z

Backget233:

This is the absolute peak of toxic internet irony. Oscar & friend sets up a dedicated wiki page to compile a dossier on an anonymous online user tracking their handles, platform history, and arguments and then turns around and acts like they are the victim of "vandalism" because the person tries to delete or clear out a page written entirely about them.

“Good faith” is ironic coming people who slander someone with strawman arguments The name doesn’t even have restricted in it, that’s how much inaccurate this page is lol FAN FICTION . Such a fixation . Any model that needs this much protection was never science . Keep proving me right , if it was science the model would be ENCOURAGED for falsification

This is pure fan fiction behavior. Not only are you saying "good faith," good faith is not writing about somebody, putting up a profile, strawmanning their whole argument, putting the account... the account's not even under the right name. The name no longer even has "restricted" in it. This is fan fiction behavior. This is a fan fiction account. This is fan fiction obsession. Like, if your model needs this much protection, you're proving in real time it's not a science.

When does science need this much protection? No, only an unfalsifiable model needs this much protection. And you're getting upset that someone is vandalizing a page, slandering and strawmanning. It's ironic. This is internet brain rot. You haven't met the person. You don't even know the person's name. But yet you think you know, you're so comfortable writing about a person you don't even know because they have opposing views.